Private Reggie wrote:
Total Pants Skull
Any payment in advance in a business is an investment, Owners/operators of Taxi's pay in advance, Drivers do not pay in advance and that is a Rental not an investment, If a Taxi is off the road the owner/operator still pay's a driver does not
Ive been finance free for the last 4 years so using your theory you accept im one who is not owned

But again you could say that until we are debt free we are ALL owned, we all have debt of some form don't we, if i own my house then i have debt that is structured over 25 years, if i'd rented my destiny/destination is then in the hands of another, i'd rather own than rent, light at the end of the tunnel skull light at the end of the tunnel
I believe in the system that is, some are happy to play, the majority are happy to play, Skull not the small minority like you

Well, in that situation Dougie, you must agree with a driver having unfettered access to the tools of his trade. Therefore, there is no reason to deny him the choice to buy his own vehicle as he is already earning a living doing the job he's qualified to do. So Dougie, if we just give the qualified driver the choice to own or rent, you can hand your plate back to the council, when you retire or expire, whichever comes first. You don't own it anyway it's council property.
I'm glad we can agree on something, Dougie.
Oh and Dougie, you're the one buying the new taxi in a depreciating market with diminishing returns, now that's a funny investment, if ever there was one.
If you feel compelled to respond to the above Dougie, try staying in the real world.
