Skull wrote:
Fact is these surveys are bogus.
The council sets the questions to get the results it wants. And the tendered company delivers, it has no real choice.
And the questions exclude a real analysis of peak periods.
The council also relies on evidence submitted by the companies. And we know that these figures have been falsified in the past. Even to the point where, in their desperation to come up with random and reasonable numbers, personal plate, address and other numbers were slotted in. Again, this evidence was accepted by the committee although it had not been properly audited. And those offering the data had a vested interest to submit data that ensured that vested interest was protected.
The committee has never asked any searching questions about how the data was gathered or interpreted, because councillors are subservient to the policy. Even if councillors had doubts about the veracity of the information before it, they are not empowered to buck the policy. This is not a fair process.
fact is, there is only one litmus test for demand, and that's market forces.
Unrestricted London, professional widely respected cabbies.
Restricted where cabbies are held in such high regard customers are deserting them in droves.
Doesn't it all speak for itself?