Taxi Driver Online

You can't half chat some sh*te and come away having said very little at all

My religious extremist friends I think you must confused I don't have any religious extremist friends you fool

A debate is just a formal discussion and so far you have failed to persuade me to your side of the argument, you have not provided sufficient evidence to prove your point, what evidence have you provided that if you ban Islam the fundamentalist will go away. that senseless killing will be stopped or indeed that Islam won't be taught anyway in secret?

As regards to making a valid point it is you who believes that the point you made is valid, it's not I all I did was express an opinion. It's my opinion, of which I am entitled to have regardless of your opinion, that you are a crazy person driven to your beliefs through emotional ties. Also if I read and understood the argument very poorly then perhaps it was the way it was written As you will undoubtedly know it is important to keep things simple, because, although you may wish to sound clever you could come across as incomprehensible and that is another debating skill, ffs.



You should try expressing yourself more eloquently to sum up your position in your own words rather than using the words of others over and over again. I didn't call you fascist I think you're fool, but, that is only my opinion.

Here is something else that is my opinion, let the person that commits the crime face the punishment you can not hold the misguided beliefs of a crazy person against a whole host of other people just because the crazy person named their religion as the reason for their murdering act.

Where do you get this sh*e. Whatever Churchill did it doesn't make his observations about Islam any less correct?

Oh and if your British born subject sees himself a Muslim first, then that's fine with me, so let his brothers take care of him in a Muslim country of his choice. I am sure they will welcome him and his extremist views with open arms.

God woman

Oh and I never said that Islamic fundamentalists would go away or the senseless killing would be stopped or that it wouldn’t be taught in secret, it was you who said that.

Churchill was the architect of the Dardanelles campaign during the first world war - he was generally regarded as an adventurer - this campaign led to the deaths of thousands.

He was similarly responsible for the formation of the 'Black and Tans' in Ireland which terrorised the country.

His policies during WW2 led to the starvation of millions in India - his policy of starvation led to Germany being blockaded during WW1 and thousands of civilian deaths - his bombing campaign during WW2 deliberately targeted civilians courtesy of bomber Harris.

Churchill famously stated "History will be kind to me for I intend to write it." - never had you down as a sap.

What God would that be



Quite right I did ask about these things, as your argument seems to be that if we send them on a boat to elsewhere the problem would be solved, this however does not seem to hold up if you check your history.

Btw it really is a pretty poor debate if you have to resort to personal insults, I'm no more an extreme fundamentalist than you. For the record I don't like people who preach hate of any kind and I would prefer that they were locked up so they couldn't do it, but, apparently that's not what appears to happen in this country because we have a freedom of speech. Personally I think that perhaps some of the things said by some people should be dealt with but I'm not sure where one would draw line.

So anyway lets suppose we send all these extreme fundamentalists away on a boat to wherever, how is that going to stop them influencing people here? It's not like they can't communicate with each other is it? So my question to you is how does your solution solve the problem when the puppeteer probably isn't even resident in the UK?

Before we get into this, watch this documentary from a few years back. And make your mind up first, about exactly what it is we are dealing with. Oh and Toots, if you don't watch the video, you have little room to comment on anything proposed by me.

There are 10 parts to this vid, which makes it about an hour out of your life. Oh and it falls short with regards American and British foreign policy, but there are Muslims making a very clear point about Islamic Jihad and the west.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMLJJEDD ... re=mh_lolz

Oh and my solution is a proposal backed by a reasoned argument that strategically, we live on an Island with a relatively small population. And we need some way to separate the moderate Muslims from the radical and one way, is to have everyone swearing allegiance to the flag and deporting those with extremist views if they don't.

If you want to live in the UK, then your country must come first. And if you cannot embrace a western way of life, you should not be here, it's that simple. Now I don't think this would be a problem for any moderate peace-loving Muslim.

Oh and Toots, your proposal, if that's what you want to call it, is just to let the law do it's job, but unfortunately this only happens, after the bodies start to pile up.

Your the one making proposals, not me. I'm pointing out a flaw in your proposal.

TBH I dont think anyone who's prepared to kill for their cause will worry much about breaking an oath to a flag, country or monarch they despise. They will make the oath and ignore it.

You also haven't addressed the valid question of how you deport someone who is a British subject?

What if they refuse to choose one?
What if their chosen country refuses to accept them?

It's not that I dont have an opinion Skull. I've given that already, as have others.
In this case I think your proposal is simplistic and will prove unworkable.

I'll comment on the video when I have time to watch it.

Gusmac, there are parts of Afghanistan, India and Pakistan, which are almost completely lawless. No one knows who the feck is going in and out over their borders. And that's before we even start talking about Syria, Lebanon and other places in the middle east. Oh and I think you will find that turning their Islamic "brothers" away, is not what being a good Muslim is all about. It would go against their beliefs.

Can you imagine the uproar by the Islamic brotherhood, if they tried to pull a stunt like that? Quite honestly, I don't think they would risk it. My suggestion is about using their extremist Islamic beliefs against them. Let's send them back to where they belong.

Oh and Gus, how do you think these extremists get into these place to become trained terrorists in the first place? And trust me on this, if they decided to stay in Afghanistan or Pakistan, no one would notice. The mistake is letting them back into this country.

Okay, you think my proposal is simplistic and unworkable. I've answered it by giving you the reasons why it could work. And I don't think deportation is a problem as long as our government is prepared to opt out of HR, charter, on this issue. And they can do it, if extremism is considered to be a serious threat to state security. Basically, Cameron is playing politics with peoples lives when this situation needs drastic measures to get it under some sort of control. These fundamentalists look at this as a War to bring about an Islamic state and Cameron has to wake-up to the fact, or the bodies will continue to pile up at an alarming rate.

What next?