Taxi Driver Online

The members, have lost control over their committees. A mixture of poor communication and apathy put the committee in command through the proxy voting system. They solicit votes from shareholders prior to the AGM/EGM to load the dice against the members who actually turn up to the meetings.

I read somewhere that if you have a group of people, greater than 150 individuals, then breakdowns in communication are commonplace and apathy becomes wide spread. In short, the committee, for the most part, just does as it pleases.

Interests are then served from the top down (the committee) instead of the bottom up, their members or shareholders.

Alas that is all too commonplace with so-called driver owned circuits, but my point is more along the lines the lads on that circuit must be well pleased to get the airport, even if they do share it with PH.

And if that is true, then surely that committee have done the best for those drivers.

Or are the ones ranked up there doing so by way of protest?

A fair point, however, what if everything turns to shi* five years down the road, when your benevolent Ph company no longer requires your services, once you have assisted in the further expansion of their business interests, to the detriment of your company and the trade, as a whole?

Oh and then certain members of your committee decide to jump ship to the competition, job done?

I wrote:


Sussex wrote:


I wrote:


Now it's your turn Artur?????

The members, have lost control over their committees. A mixture of poor communication and apathy put the committee in command through the proxy voting system. They solicit votes from shareholders prior to the AGM/EGM to load the dice against the members who actually turn up to the meetings.

I read somewhere that if you have a group of people, greater than 150 individuals, then breakdowns in communication are commonplace and apathy becomes wide spread. In short, the committee, for the most part, just does as it pleases.

Interests are then served from the top down (the committee) instead of the bottom up, their members or shareholders.

Alas that is all too commonplace with so-called driver owned circuits, but my point is more along the lines the lads on that circuit must be well pleased to get the airport, even if they do share it with PH.

And if that is true, then surely that committee have done the best for those drivers.

Or are the ones ranked up there doing so by way of protest?

A fair point, however, what if everything turns to shi* five years down the road, when your benevolent Ph company no longer requires your services, once you have assisted in the further expansion of their business interests, to the detriment of your company and the trade, as a whole?

Oh and then certain members of your committee decide to jump ship to the competition, job done?

Now it's your turn Artur?????

Again, now it's your turn Artur?????

Sometime soon I hope, a wee answer maybe???