Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 09, 2026 1:46 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Driver suspended in operation targeting Stevenage taxis

The crackdown was a joint operation between the police, borough and county councils. The crackdown was a joint operation between the police, borough and county councils.

Stevenage taxis that fail to comply with the law were targeted in a joint operation between the police and council, with one driver suspended.

Officers from Herts police, including members of the Stevenage Safer Neighbourhood Team, worked alongside licensing officers from Stevenage Borough Council and Hertfordshire County Council on Thursday.

The team started by carrying out checks on the buses and coaches dropping students off at The Valley School, while the afternoon was used to stop taxis, ensuring they were compliant with the law and the terms of their licences.

All the vehicles were checked for faults or defects, while background checks on the drivers were also carried out.

More than 40 vehicles were stopped during the operation. Two were issued prohibition notices for serious defects and the driver of one of these vehicles had their licence suspended.

Two other drivers were issued with a Vehicle Defect Rectification Scheme notice for an insecure battery and damaged windscreen. Advice was also given to a number of other drivers for minor vehicle defects.

The day was part of Operation Vector – a county wide campaign to ensure that taxis and taxi drivers comply with the law and the terms of their licences.

Sgt Sam Cordingley from the Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire Road Policing Unit led the operation.

He said: “A large number of vehicles were stopped and encouragingly most were found to be in good working order.

“This operation was a good success and is vitally important to ensure that the public can remain safe when using licensed private hire vehicles and Hackney carriages. The checks we carried out on student transportation should also help reassure the public that we will take any infringement on people’s safety very seriously.

“Taxi drivers across the county should now be aware that if they do not comply with the law and their licences they will be found out and may be liable for a fine or prosecution.”

Councillor Richard Henry, responsible for safer communities, older people and health at Stevenage Borough Council, said: “Operations like this are a good example of how we’re working co-operatively with our partners for the benefit of those in the town. I’m pleased that most of the vehicles that we stopped were in good order, but it’s vital that licensed private hire vehicles and Hackney carriages are safe to use in Stevenage and we want the public to be assured that they are.”

http://www.thecomet.net/news/driver_sus ... _1_3797666

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 8:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:15 am
Posts: 79
One small correction to the above. No drivers or vehicles were suspended during the course of this operation The proprietor of one of the vehicles issued with a prohibition notice agreed to have the plate removed pending repairs to the vehicle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
Blueknight wrote:
One small correction to the above. No drivers or vehicles were suspended during the course of this operation The proprietor of one of the vehicles issued with a prohibition notice agreed to have the plate removed pending repairs to the vehicle.



i hope they followed the correct procedure or he could be driving without insurance.
Removal of plate = section 58 applies therefore a formal section 68 notice
MUST have been issued or section 58 would not apply unless licence had
expired or been revoked. (if revoked then formal notice should also have
been given in writing to include the right of appeal).
So no 68 = no 58 and if 68 was issued then a formal 58 notice would also
have been required.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 566 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group