Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu May 07, 2026 5:42 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
Under legislation hackneys may carry advertising, it's only private hire over which councils have the power to allow or prohibit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 8:55 pm
Posts: 479
mancityfan wrote:
Under legislation hackneys may carry advertising, it's only private hire over which councils have the power to allow or prohibit.


The greedy fecks in my borough charge hackneys £25 for the privilege of putting an advert on there own vechicle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
Midlife martyr wrote:
mancityfan wrote:
Under legislation hackneys may carry advertising, it's only private hire over which councils have the power to allow or prohibit.


The greedy fecks in my borough charge hackneys £25 for the privilege of putting an advert on there own vechicle.



Name and shame them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 8:55 pm
Posts: 479
Nidge2 wrote:
Midlife martyr wrote:
mancityfan wrote:
Under legislation hackneys may carry advertising, it's only private hire over which councils have the power to allow or prohibit.


The greedy fecks in my borough charge hackneys £25 for the privilege of putting an advert on there own vechicle.



Name and shame them.


Doncaster.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
The Drivers in R otherham have a great opportunity to prove to the public they have nothing to fear from being under scrutiny whilst working . and that the activities within the Cab trade recently were not the actions of the vast majority ..........ie we are clean and will prove it !................................Their response we will strike =D> stupid indeed they open themselves to accusations which they cant defend "what you got to hide?" ..................and of course this device will safeguard them against physical attacks from the PUBLIC which are all too common and this FACT can be used to deflect VERBAL attacks upon the INDUSTRY!

Pathetic squealing about the cost of CCTV reveals the crass stupidity of those involved.a STUPIDITY I HAVE NEVER SEEN EQUALED GIVEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES #-o

Fit the CCTV benefit from its protection personally and defend the industry by transparency hardly Rocket Science #-o

EVIDENTLY FOR THESE AS SUSSEX SAYS THICK AS PIG SH!T MUGS #-o

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Rotherham councillors back controversial new licensing laws for taxi drivers



Councillors have backed tougher new licensing measures for Rotherham taxi drivers - including putting CCTV in all cabs - despite the implementation of the measures being delayed.

The policy had already been approved by Commissioner Mary Ney, but was supported almost unanimously at a full meeting of Rotherham Council this afternoon.

It had originally been announced the policy changes would come into place from the start of this week, with drivers being required to fit CCTV into their vehicles within three months at their own cost.

But following an angry reaction from many drivers, including around 100 taking part in a protest outside the Town Hall and dozens participating in ‘go-slow’ drives around town, a further meeting was held on Monday with officials from the Rotherham Private Hire Drivers Association.

It was announced prior to the council meeting that more time will be granted to arrange issues such as the timescale for the introduction of CCTV.

The new licensing policy also includes measures such as requiring drivers to pass a ‘fit and proper’ persons test and a requirement to have a BTEC qualification.

In addition, every driver will also be given training on how to spot the signs of child sexual exploitation.

Drivers have said they are concerned about the potential costs of the changes and feel they are being made ‘scapegoats’ for the grooming scandal.

The shake-up has been made in direct response to concerns being raised about the role of taxi drivers in the town’s grooming scandal.

The only councillor to abstain from voting to note the already-approved policy was Councillor Shaukat Ali, one of four current and former Labour councillors suspended by the party last year in the wake of the Jay report.

He was critical of the way the council has handled communications with drivers over the ‘very sensitive’ issue and called for improved ‘race relations’ in future.

Coun Ali said: “It is an embarrassment the way this has been handled.”

His comments were applauded by taxi drivers’ representatives in the public gallery.

But other councillors were supportive of the move.

Coun Brian Steele said the changes were being made to ‘protect the most vulnerable in society’ and added CCTV could protect drivers from false allegations.

Coun Caven Vines added: “I would like to congratulate Commissioner Ney for having the backbone and guts to take this on. It is welcomed by 95 per cent of the public of Rotherham.”

Councillor Emma Wallis said ‘embryonic conversations’ are taking place with other councils about the possibility of extending the new licensing regulations across South Yorkshire.

“Everyone is aware that local authority boundaries are only lines on a map,” she said.

source: http://www.southyorkshiretimes.co.uk/ne ... -1-7348938

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Coun Ali said: “It is an embarrassment the way this has been handled.”

His comments were applauded by taxi drivers’ representatives in the public gallery.

But not as embarrassing as being a Councillor in Rotherham.

Was it 1,400 cases of sexual abuse ignored?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Coun Ali said: “It is an embarrassment the way this has been handled.”

His comments were applauded by taxi drivers’ representatives in the public gallery.

But not as embarrassing as being a Councillor in Rotherham.

Was it 1,400 cases of sexual abuse ignored?


=D> =D> =D>

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 711 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group