Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 08, 2026 12:21 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Colchester taxi drivers suspended

THREE taxi drivers working in Colchester have had their licences suspended.

Action was taken against one of the drivers, who allegedly used a mobile phone while driving, and another, who is accused of failing to comply with rank discipline and ignored traffic signs.

A third allegedly ignored rank discipline – by leaving a hackney carriage unattended in a rank – and reversed up the town’s High Street.

Colchester Council, which licenses private hire cars and hackney carriages, would not provide details of where and when the offences took place or the firms the drivers are employed by.

However, it said the offences came to light after drivers were spotted breaching rules by either council officers or the police.

CCTV footage was then downloaded to back up their witness accounts.

The driver who is accused of using his mobile phone has been suspended for 21 days, the second driver for 28 days and the third driver’s suspension period is still to be determined.

The suspensions have been imposed as the council claims the drivers failed to comply with the Taxi and Private Hire Licensing Policy.

The council monitors taxi drivers’ behaviour through a penalty points scheme and drivers who accrue 12 points are suspended.

The drivers can appeal against the suspension within 21 days.

A Colchester Council spokesman said: “The decision to suspend lies with the licensing team, based on the evidence.”

Depending on howmany points the drivers may have accrued, the matter may also go to the council’s sub-committee who can uphold, reduce, increase or dismiss the suspension.

If the driver is unhappy with that, they have the right of appeal to magistrates, who cannot overturn the decision, but refer it back to the committee to hear again.

More than 700 taxi drivers hold licences with the council.

source: http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/13438888._/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
sounds like another fecked up council
Quote:
have the right of appeal to magistrates, who cannot overturn the decision


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 11:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
skippy41 wrote:
sounds like another fecked up council
Quote:
have the right of appeal to magistrates, who cannot overturn the decision

My understanding is that the magistrates don't overturn. They either agree with the Council or, as stated, refer the matter back to the Council. Maybe things are different over the border.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:35 pm
Posts: 1855
'Alleged' offences, at least they had CCTV evidence to back up their claims unlike some who just take the word of an officer, or worse, a member of the public.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57377
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
sounds like another fecked up council
Quote:
have the right of appeal to magistrates, who cannot overturn the decision

My understanding is that the magistrates don't overturn. They either agree with the Council or, as stated, refer the matter back to the Council. Maybe things are different over the border.

It's a complete new hearing, they can and often do overturn.

Very seldom, if ever, does a Mags court refer back to the council, that would be a Judicial Review process.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57377
Location: 1066 Country
All that said, in my view the punishments given for these offences are disproportionate to the licensing breach.

Would they suspend a council official for 21 days if they got caught using their mobile whilst driving?

I very much doubt they would.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Sussex wrote:
All that said, in my view the punishments given for these offences are disproportionate to the licensing breach.

Would they suspend a council official for 21 days if they got caught using their mobile whilst driving? irrelevant they aint prof drivers transporting the public FFS



I very much doubt they would.


The rank indiscipline is hardly serious .......................one week suss

Driving whilst on the phone extremely dangerous as a professional driver he should be banned for LIFE !



My view TT

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 585 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group