Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 08, 2026 7:01 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Council launches five-year money saving deal for taxi operators in Worcester

TAXI drivers are being offered the chance to save cash on getting permission to operate in Worcester - as long as they sign up for five years.

After Government changes in the law, Worcester City Council has agreed to offer operators a deal for long term licences.

Under the Deregulation Act 2015, ministers have ordered a bonfire of red tape and bureaucracy around the management of cabbies.

It means taxi operators, who currently must fork out a £285 yearly 'licence fee' to the city council, can now pay £1,080 to secure a five-year one instead.

The saving is a whopping £354, with council chiefs saying it will ease off some of the paperwork, ultimately saving taxpayers' money, and offer taxi firms a better deal.

Under the law, the council must still offer operators the option of a 12-month licence if they wish.

It has been accepted by councillors despite some concern around the value operators get for it.

Councillor Paul Denham, the vice-chairman of the licensing and environmental health committee, said: "I've been asked by the trade to raise what service they get from Worcestershire Regulatory Services in return for that fee.

"There are quite a lot of regulations around taxi drivers, they have to log all the customers who use it and for good reason, in case anything happens and they need to trace someone.

"But some operators haven't had a visit from officers in years, I'd like to know what they are buying for this and what service they can expect back."

Niall McMenamin, a senior licensing officer at the council, said: "It pays for the cost of administration, producing statistics for the Government, answering Freedom of Information Requests, complying with legislation, the list goes on.

"Whenever we get complaints about an operator it needs to be checked out too, so it goes towards that."

Councillor Chris Mitchell, the council's cabinet member for finance, said: "It is a lot of money to find in one go but we're here to ensure the safety of the public.

"By law, the council isn't allowed to profit from it."

If taxi operators take up the one-year option they will still pay the current yearly fee of £285.

source: http://www.halesowennews.co.uk/news/wor ... Worcester/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
as b*llshit goes - this is as good as I've seen for a while

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
Should be £285, so a big over charge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
The saving is a whopping £354, with council chiefs saying it will ease off some of the paperwork, ultimately saving taxpayers' money, and offer taxi firms a better deal.


Love it. When the £354 is a saving it's a whooping saving..... when it's a cost it would be described as a small % followed by how much they haven't increased it in years :roll:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57375
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Niall McMenamin, a senior licensing officer at the council, said: "It pays for the cost of administration, producing statistics for the Government, answering Freedom of Information Requests, complying with legislation, the list goes on.

Clearly someone hasn't read the 1976 act.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Niall McMenamin, a senior licensing officer at the council, said: "It pays for the cost of administration, producing statistics for the Government, answering Freedom of Information Requests, complying with legislation, the list goes on.

Clearly someone hasn't read the 1976 act.

At a meeting I had with our licensing department it was mentioned about the cost of producing statistics for the government being added to the license cost.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57375
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Niall McMenamin, a senior licensing officer at the council, said: "It pays for the cost of administration, producing statistics for the Government, answering Freedom of Information Requests, complying with legislation, the list goes on.

Clearly someone hasn't read the 1976 act.

At a meeting I had with our licensing department it was mentioned about the cost of producing statistics for the government being added to the license cost.

Yet more nonsense. Ask them on what basis, and what other council does likewise.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 624 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group