Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 7:37 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 1:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: City of dreaming spires
Consultation on regulating cab-hailing app’s business in the capital ditched as London mayor Boris Johnson says plans are afoot to rein in pedal rickshaws



Uber is claiming a major victory after Transport for London (TfL) ditched a number of proposals that would have imposed restrictions on the taxi hailing app’s business.

Tfl has decided against implementing proposals that would have hit Uber’s service including forcing operators to provide booking confirmation details to the passenger at least five minutes before a journey starts.

However, following a consultation launched in September, TfL said on Wednesday that it planned to introduce new regulations including a formal English-language requirement for all London taxis.

Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, has also secured a commitment for legislation to allow TfL to regulate pedal rickshaws that operate in central London.

The US company has more than 20,000 drivers in London but its future was thrown into doubt last year when Tfl, the body that regulates public transport in the capital, launched a far-reaching consultation process after pressure from rivals such as the minicab firm Addison Lee and black cab operators. They argued that Uber was unfairly competing with them, since the firm is not subject to the same kind of regulations.


Jo Bertram, Uber’s regional general manager in the UK, said: “We’re pleased that Transport for London has listened to the views of passengers and drivers, dropping the bonkers ideas proposed last year like compulsory five-minute wait times and banning showing cars in apps.”

More details to follow ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
187ums wrote:
Consultation on regulating cab-hailing app’s business in the capital ditched as London mayor Boris Johnson says plans are afoot to rein in pedal rickshaws



Uber is claiming a major victory after Transport for London (TfL) ditched a number of proposals that would have imposed restrictions on the taxi hailing app’s business.

Tfl has decided against implementing proposals that would have hit Uber’s service including forcing operators to provide booking confirmation details to the passenger at least five minutes before a journey starts.

However, following a consultation launched in September, TfL said on Wednesday that it planned to introduce new regulations including a formal English-language requirement for all London taxis.

Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, has also secured a commitment for legislation to allow TfL to regulate pedal rickshaws that operate in central London.

The US company has more than 20,000 drivers in London but its future was thrown into doubt last year when Tfl, the body that regulates public transport in the capital, launched a far-reaching consultation process after pressure from rivals such as the minicab firm Addison Lee and black cab operators. They argued that Uber was unfairly competing with them, since the firm is not subject to the same kind of regulations.


Jo Bertram, Uber’s regional general manager in the UK, said: “We’re pleased that Transport for London has listened to the views of passengers and drivers, dropping the bonkers ideas proposed last year like compulsory five-minute wait times and banning showing cars in apps.”

More details to follow ...


Wrong as usual the English language requirement is for Londons PH drivers #-o

Boris is also considering making PH pay the congestion charge!

And making PH give binding fare quotes !

Of course this is pie in the Sky if Sadik Khan the Labour candidate gets elected in May :D

currently TFL are receiving 700 applications a week for PH licenses :badgrin: :badgrin: PH proprietors have never gad it so good #-o the bleedin scum are raking it in :twisted:

Meanwhile the GMBPDB have lost over 600 new members they recruited mostly Uber drivers in disgust at the GMBPDB's Branch secretarys betrayal of their cause he reportedly told them " work for me and my company #-o " I am going to shut down UBER ! They voted with their feet and had it away, once the Groveller Paul Kenny has departed the new temporary Gen sec will intervene and sort out the Professional Drivers Branch's corruption :badgrin: :badgrin: Evidently!

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:18 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
trotskys twin wrote:
Boris is also considering making PH pay the congestion charge!

Madness. ](*,)

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:26 am
Posts: 130
Sussex wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
Boris is also considering making PH pay the congestion charge!

Madness. ](*,)


£11:50 per day X 6 Days a week X 92000 private hire drivers X 52 equals:

£330,096,000

So (very) approximately £300 million per year into TFL coffers - not so mad after all :D

_________________
"Where to, Guv'?. Na sorry not going my way"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Sussex wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
Boris is also considering making PH pay the congestion charge!

Madness. ](*,)



So if you get a fare up to London on a week day are you exempt ? I know I have to pay it not that we go there often as people always expect charity rates :roll:

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
edders23 wrote:
Sussex wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
Boris is also considering making PH pay the congestion charge!

Madness. ](*,)



So if you get a fare up to London on a week day are you exempt ? I know I have to pay it not that we go there often as people always expect charity rates :roll:


YER A PH YOKEL YER PAY IT :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
trotskys twin wrote:
edders23 wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
Boris is also considering making PH pay the congestion charge!

Madness. ](*,)


So if you get a fare up to London on a week day are you exempt ? I know I have to pay it not that we go there often as people always expect charity rates :roll:


YER A PH YOKEL YER PAY IT :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin:



Don't be so insulting HACKNEY thank you

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:22 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
blobby wrote:
£11:50 per day X 6 Days a week X 92000 private hire drivers X 52 equals:

£330,096,000

So (very) approximately £300 million per year into TFL coffers - not so mad after all :D

A considerable number are hybrids which pay no charge, a considerable number are Euro 5 which pay no charge, and a considerable number are nine seaters (driver + 8 punters) that pay no charge, and of course a considerable number of the rest are owned by folks living in the congestion zones.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
Uber hails victory after Transport for London drops restriction


on the same day as an uber driver is jailed for attempted rape, the irony.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:26 am
Posts: 130
Sussex wrote:
blobby wrote:
£11:50 per day X 6 Days a week X 92000 private hire drivers X 52 equals:

£330,096,000

So (very) approximately £300 million per year into TFL coffers - not so mad after all :D

A considerable number are hybrids which pay no charge, a considerable number are Euro 5 which pay no charge, and a considerable number are nine seaters (driver + 8 punters) that pay no charge, and of course a considerable number of the rest are owned by folks living in the congestion zones.


And an even more considerable number are none of the above - did you read "(very) approximately £300 million"

In the case of hybrid cars like the Prius it is only the plug in version that is exempt. Euro 5 cars that emit less than 75gm/km cost a minimum of £30k to purchase and out of the reach of a lot of drivers. A tiny amount of private hire vehicles in London are nine seaters. I suspect there will be drivers who reside within the zone and qualify for 100% relief but again I doubt this is many out of 92,000.

It will still be an enormous amount of cash and affect a great many drivers.

_________________
"Where to, Guv'?. Na sorry not going my way"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
blobby wrote:
Sussex wrote:
blobby wrote:
£11:50 per day X 6 Days a week X 92000 private hire drivers X 52 equals:

£330,096,000

So (very) approximately £300 million per year into TFL coffers - not so mad after all :D

A considerable number are hybrids which pay no charge, a considerable number are Euro 5 which pay no charge, and a considerable number are nine seaters (driver + 8 punters) that pay no charge, and of course a considerable number of the rest are owned by folks living in the congestion zones.


And an even more considerable number are none of the above - did you read "(very) approximately £300 million"

In the case of hybrid cars like the Prius it is only the plug in version that is exempt. Euro 5 cars that emit less than 75gm/km cost a minimum of £30k to purchase and out of the reach of a lot of drivers. A tiny amount of private hire vehicles in London are nine seaters. I suspect there will be drivers who reside within the zone and qualify for 100% relief but again I doubt this is many out of 92,000.

It will still be an enormous amount of cash and affect a great many drivers. [/quote]

:badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sussex and 915 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group