Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed May 06, 2026 9:41 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Whitehall’s reluctance to tackle taxi loophole ‘deeply concerning’


The Government's reluctance to tackle Rotherham taxi loophole is ‘deeply concerning’, say MPs.

A Communities and Local Government Committee report into the use of commissioners in Rotherham after a child sex scandal and Tower Hamlets after allegations of corruption, called for consistent taxi licensing standards across the country.

Under current arrangements it is possible for taxis licensed in one area to operate in another area where there are more stringent licensing rules.

For example, Rotherham mandates that taxis must be fitted with CCTV, but taxis coming into Rotherham from other areas are not necessarily fitted with the same security systems.

The committee’s chair Clive Betts MP characterised the Government’s response to their recommendations as ‘deeply concerning’.

‘Children and vulnerable adults will remain at risk in Rotherham for as long as the local authority's tough new licensing rules can be undermined by taxis from other areas,’ he said.

‘The Government must monitor the new statutory guidance for taxi licensing when it is introduced to see that it not only ensures consistently high standards across the country but also enables local authorities to put in place and enforce specific measures appropriate for their areas.

‘If the guidance fails in this regard, then the Government should legislate. The reluctance of Ministers to commit to either of these actions is deeply concerning.’

source: http://www.localgov.co.uk/Whitehalls-re ... ning/41961

Children at risk because of ‘deeply concerning’ DCLG stance in Rotherham taxi fears

Children and vulnerable adults are at risk of exploitation because of the government’s failure to adopt a recommendation on taxi licensing, the Communities and Local Government Committee (CLGC) has said.

Back in August, as part of its report into the success of government interventions into Rotherham and Tower Hamlets councils, the CLGC said it was a concern that taxis licensed in other areas could operate within a council’s remit without the same regulations the council applied to its own taxis.

Responding to the report today, the DCLG claimed it “strongly agreed” with a recommendation for further legislation regarding taxi licensing, but did not commit to monitoring the effectiveness of the reforms, or introducing further legislation if needed.

In response, Clive Betts MP, chair of the CLGC, said: “Children and vulnerable adults will remain at risk in Rotherham for as long as the local authority's tough new licensing rules can be undermined by taxis from other areas.

“The government must monitor the new statutory guidance for taxi licensing when it is introduced to see that it not only ensures consistently high standards across the country but also enables local authorities to put in place and enforce specific measures appropriate for their areas.

“If the guidance fails in this regard, then the government should legislate. The reluctance of ministers to commit to either of these actions is deeply concerning.”

Last year, Rotherham Council was found ‘not fit for purpose’ over its handling of sexual exploitation involving at least 1,400 children.

A small number of taxi drivers were involved in the exploitation, pushing the council, under control of government commissioners, to introduce more stringent licensing requirements – such as mandatory CCTV in taxis – as part of the reforms since then.

Sir Derek Myers, lead commissioner for Rotherham, also recently recommended restoring taxi licensing powers to the council because of the safety improvements.

However, the CLGC called it a “significant loophole” that taxis licensed in other areas, which were not subject to the requirements, were able to operate in Rotherham.

It argued the DCLG, the Home Office and the Department for Transport should include legislation on the issue in the new Policing and Crime Bill to show that lessons had been learned from Rotherham.

The DCLG agreed to do this, despite rejecting the recommendation to monitor the impact of the new legislation.

It also adopted the majority of the CLGC report’s other recommendations, including legislation to place government commissioners on the list of prescribed persons in the Public Interest Disclosure (Prescribed Persons) Order 2014.

This would mean that, if an authority is found to be so troubled that it is taken over by commissioners, it would then be easier for whistleblowers to approach the commissioners. Betts welcomed the “swift action and positive response” from the government in this regard.

The committee also asked the DCLG to provide a broad indication of the number of local authorities who were receiving enhanced monitoring or were at risk of intervention at two dates this year – 29 February and 31 August.

But the department said there were councils “at any time” who it was keeping an eye on, and publishing the number did not “give much of an indication of the health of the sector”.

It added that it was not aware of any local authorities whose situation was “so severe as to warrant an intervention” at either of those dates.

source: http://www.publicsectorexecutive.com/Pu ... taxi-fears

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20866
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
The government doesn't want to tackle taxi law reform and won't do so until it becomes politically expedient to do so either through a major outcry or pressure from lobbyists/ party donors

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
edders23 wrote:
The government doesn't want to tackle taxi law reform and won't do so until it becomes politically expedient to do so either through a major outcry or pressure from lobbyists/ party donors

I would have thought that the Rotherham scandal would be classed as a "major outcry".

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57364
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
The government doesn't want to tackle taxi law reform and won't do so until it becomes politically expedient to do so either through a major outcry or pressure from lobbyists/ party donors

I think the more MPs that get the message the better, but it's a long old road.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 816 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group