Sussex wrote:
Sussex wrote:
John Gallacher, a multiple taxi plate holder, said: “I do everything for my drivers. If a driver gets three points on their licence, I also get three points on my licence. “Drivers shouldn’t have a say on how the fare structure operates because a driver could have six months experience. I have seen on three or four occasions that the taxi trade has been brought to it’s knees because of increases and I have fought to stop it. Why should drivers get a say on how my business operates?” He added: “If I ask a guy with six months experience ‘do you want a fare rise?’ he’s going to say yes. It’s as simple as that.”
Can someone please confirm that we are in 2017, not 1817?
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
A reference to 19th century politics was made at the hearing.
The LO - determined not to extend the consultation process to include drivers- defended stoutly "that drivers were not operators" (of taxis,) even though Secy of State guidance is given that drivers may be prosecuted for "operating a taxi" unlawfully and 'operate' includes 'plying for hire'.
His put forward the arguement there was confusion between the verb 'to operate' and the noun 'operator' which were not the same!
It should be pointed out that the Clydebank does not have the highest 'fares' in the country but has amongst the highest fees.