Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 2:15 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18534
Batley man smashed taxi windscreen as he DANCED in the front passenger seat

https://www.examiner.co.uk/news/west-yo ... d-14938998

Shaun Inness offered the cabbie £20 compensation saying he just got carried away

Image
Shaun Inness at Kirklees Magistrates' Court (Image: Huddersfield Daily Examiner)

A taxi passenger wrecked a windscreen – and said his “dancing arms” were to blame.

Shaun Inness, of Abbey Road in Batley, gave the bizarre excuse when he was arrested for damaging the vehicle late on July 1.

Prosecutor Natalie Chapman told Kirklees magistrates that at 10pm the 31-year-old had ordered a taxi from his father’s address.

The cabbie, from Bankfield Ventures Ltd, showed up and he got into the front passenger seat.

There he punched the front windscreen, causing the glass to crack.

Inness offered to pay the driver £20 but he refused as it cost considerably more to replace the glass, the Huddersfield court was told.

Police were called and Inness left but he was arrested an hour later – after ordering another taxi back to his dad’s house and banging on the door.

Miss Chapman said: “The defendant said he was dancing around in the front passenger seat.

“He said that while dancing with his arms he recklessly pushed onto the front windscreen causing it to break.”

Magistrates were told that it cost £145 to replace the damaged windscreen.

Paul Blanchard, mitigating, explained that it was unlikely that is client would have been unable to stump up so much money as he was claiming Employment and Support Allowance and Personal Independence Payment.

He said police caught up with him when he went back to his dad’s house and described the incident as ‘a blip.’

Magistrates ordered Inness to pay £145 compensation to the taxi firm but made no order for court costs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
StuartW wrote:
Paul Blanchard, mitigating, explained that it was unlikely that is client would have been unable to stump up so much money as he was claiming Employment and Support Allowance and Personal Independence Payment.

Well don't smash the thing in the first place.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 571 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group