Taxi Driver Online

Private-hire drivers launch crowdfund for judicial review of 'corporate negligence' over Covid-19

A FUNDRAISING campaign was launched by private-hire drivers today who are seeking to bring companies and authorities’ lack of safeguards against the Covid-19 pandemic to a judicial review.

Representative body United Private Hire Drivers (UPHD) has set up the Crowdjustice campaign, to last until next Friday, for £10,000 to pay for the High Court legal challenge.

UPHD accused private-hire companies and authorities — including Transport for London (TfL) and the Department for Transport — of “corporate negligence.”

Uber and Addison Lee have offered NHS staff free and discounted journeys during the coronavirus outbreak, which UPHD said was a welcome initiative but “presents significant mutual risk for passengers and drivers.

“We owe it to drivers and to our front-line NHS staff to take regulatory action to reduce the risk of transmission of the virus in licensed private-hire vehicles.”

UPHD said that Uber and Addison Lee “promised to distribute sanitising fluids and personal protection equipment to drivers but have largely failed to do so.”

It added: “Industry efforts to manage risk responsibly have been woefully inadequate and amount to little more than lip service.”

The union also accused TfL and other licensing authorities of failing to provide personal protective equipment (PPE) for drivers, as well as detailed safety protocols and driver training.

UPHD pointed to Dutch authorities as an example of good practice, with a 1.5 metre separation between passengers and drivers, along with mandatory use of PPE and sanitation routines, and service limited to one passenger at a time.

The group called on Health Secretary Matt Hancock to take action after Uber driver Ayub Akthar died and two others fell seriously ill with the virus.

Uber driver and UPHD London committee chairman Abdurzak Hadi had himself become “seriously ill” with Covid-19 but is now recovering, the group reported.

Mr Hadi was one of the original claimants in a 2016 employment tribunal win against Uber which rejected the firm’s claim that its employees were self-employed — which the company is expected to appeal at the Supreme Court in July.

UPHD chairman James Farrar said: “In an industry rife with worker rights abuse, Uber cannot be trusted to self-regulate for the protection of drivers and passengers from Covid-19 infection.

“We are prepared to do whatever it takes to make sure no driver dies because of corporate greed and regulatory inaction.”

UPHD general secretary Yaseen Aslam said the lack of measures would overwhelmingly endanger those from BAME backgrounds as 94 per cent of drivers identify as black or of an ethnic minority.

To donate towards the fundraiser go to: crowdjustice.com/case/government-must-act-to-protect

_________________
IDFIMH

Can't argue with anyone wanting to make our trade safer.

However this will end with PH saloons not being able to work, not with the authorities having to supply PPE to the trade.

_________________
IDFIMH

If they dont like the risks then don't take the jobs.

Why can't they buy their own PPE that's what quite a few NHS workers have done

there is one person that ultimately takes responsibility for your safety...............YOU


Now I wonder what more important legal business will get delayed or shelved to make way for this

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector

Of course we are all responsible for what we do, however that doesn't stop anyone else helping out.

I think there is a good case that operators should do more, but would supplying PPE to taxi/PH drivers, who in essence aren't essential workers, mean less would find there way to NHS/Care workers who are more in the firing line than us?


Rest assured this will never make court. To me it's a bit of PR that will lead to nothing.

_________________
IDFIMH