edders23 wrote:
yes she also happens to run a certain organisation which represents PH drivers and until recently used to send a monthly newspaper to me even though I have never been a member.

Ah, I see
Just happened to see this on the PHTM website. Not sure whose work it is (I'm guessing it's the view of the NPHTA, but not sure - it could be the view of an individual member, for example), but whoever wrote it isn't a happy bunny. So if Toots/the NPHTA were involved in the consulation, they certainly aren't happy with the outcome
LATEST DFT BULLETIN IS AN INSULT AND AN UTTER DISGRACEhttps://www.phtm.co.uk/news/2920/phtm-n ... r-disgraceIT'S AN INSULT AND AN UTTER DISGRACE
On Monday 20 July 2020 the Department for Transport conducted a Microsoft Teams meeting amongst various members of the DfT and of the Task and Finish Group, to be informed of and to discuss the introduction of “Statutory Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Standards”, which will go out to be “reviewed” by all local authorities over the next six months – not sure of the start date.
This material had already gone out to industry and public consultation during 2018; no document had resulted at that time.
So now the Government does indeed acknowledge the existence of the taxi and private hire industry; however once again their primary concern – their ONLY concern - is the safety and wellbeing of taxi/PHV passengers.
That of course is also the concern of the trade itself. But these ‘statutory standards’ are entirely surrounding passenger safeguarding issues, and the prevention of the Rotherham (and others) syndrome, and increasing the drivers’ DBS checks to twice-yearly.
So for the behaviour of a very few ‘bad pennies’ amongst drivers, the entire industry is tarred with the same brush – the same brush that has airbrushed this industry out of any Government consideration for recognition, financial assistance, any sort of backup whatever during this pandemic.
For each of those cases, there are 100 serious and even fatal attacks carried out on drivers, but that doesn't matter!! We know that far more drivers get assaulted, robbed and abused every day, but that doesn't matter right?
Yes, there is mention of CCTV and whether each individual local authority will consider allowing its use in licensed vehicles. But again, their concern is entirely for the wellbeing of the passengers. Vehicle proprietors will still have to find the cost of installing this equipment; where is there any assistance along those lines?
In this bulletin there is not one word about Covid, and the effects of the pandemic/lockdown/relaxation on either transport providers, drivers or indeed their passengers.
Our industry is on its knees, drivers are out of work and suffering physical, financial and mental setbacks; companies and drivers by the hundreds are providing discounted or voluntary (free of charge) transport to NHS and key workers. Drivers are dying out there. And all this Government can do is to consider the wellbeing of passengers, and talk about safeguarding a la Rotherham.
THIS IS A DOWNRIGHT INSULT TO OUR TRADE
Read on, and give us your comments please…we will forward them straight to the DfT without hesitation.