Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 2:57 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 6:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 19651
bloodnock wrote:
Sussex wrote:
The first post of this thread, all those months ago, was a highly doom-mongering post, and most of it came to be. :sad:

However I think next year (2021) will be much much better, once those that need the vaccine (anyone with an iota of sense) receives one.

A lot of the finance guys say that billions are being saved by those who have kept their jobs, as they have had nothing to spend their money on.

So lets hope soon, likely to be around Easter time, those people spend spend spend and get the economy and our trade back into shape.

That alongside the fact that many would have left the trade for good, and no-one will be joining up for a while, could lead those of us that have stuck it out to kop a few quid. [-o<


Aye....My glass is half full as well.

my glass is about 3/4 full.

_________________
Grandad,
To support my charity text MAYORWALK to 70085 to donate £5


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 19180
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
mine is 3 quarters empty [-o<

basically we need to hang on until march then effectively start again almost from scratch the trade we had is gone now it is a case of building a new business out of the ashes of the old

_________________
Taxis Are Public Transport too

Join the campaign to get April fools jokes banned for 364 days a year !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54020
Location: 1066 Country
Covid death rates higher among taxi drivers, chefs, security guards and care workers - ONS

Men working as security guards, taxi drivers and chefs are among the groups at highest risk of dying from coronavirus, new figures suggest.

Last year, the highest Covid death rates were recorded among plant workers, followed by security guards and catering staff, according to the latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) analysis.

Plant workers suffered a rate of 143.2 deaths per 100,000 men, compared with 31.4 per 100,000 among the same age and gender group across the wider population.

For security guards and related occupations the figure stood at 100.7 deaths per 100,000 males.

Among women, some of the highest Covid-19 deaths seen among workers involved in assembly lines and routine machine operations – such as sewing machinists – as well as care workers and home carers.

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) said the pandemic has exposed “huge inequalities” in the labour market, with those in lower-paid jobs often forced to put themselves at risk.

The ONS figures cover deaths registered in England and Wales between March 9 and December 28 2020.

Ben Humberstone, ONS head of health analysis and life events, said: “Jobs with regular exposure to Covid-19 and those working in close proximity to others continue to have higher Covid-19 death rates when compared with the rest of the working age population.

“Men continue to have higher rates of death than women, making up nearly two-thirds of these deaths.”

The figures do not prove that rates of death are caused directly by differences in employment, however.

“There are a complex combination of factors that influence the risk of death, from your age and your ethnicity, where you live and who you live with, to pre-existing health conditions,” Mr Humberstone added. “Our findings do not prove that the rates of death involving Covid-19 are caused by differences in occupational exposure.”

Of all the male deaths involving Covid-19 registered in England up to December 28 2020 where an occupation was listed, the ONS found that 120 deaths were of people who worked in process plants (a rate of 143.2 deaths per 100,000 males), while 140 deaths were among security guards and related occupations (100.7).

Both of these rates were more than three times the rate for deaths involving Covid-19 among all men aged 20 to 64 (31.4).

Other occupations with high death rates among men included:

– Restaurant and catering establishment managers and proprietors (119.3 deaths per 100,000 males; 26 deaths)

– Chefs (103.1 deaths per 100,000 males; 82 deaths)

– Taxi and cab drivers and chauffeurs (101.4 deaths per 100,000 males; 209 deaths)

– Bus and coach drivers (70.3 deaths per 100,000 males; 83 deaths)

Among women, plant and machine operatives accounted for 57 deaths (33.7 deaths per 100,000 females).

Of these, assemblers and routine operatives – such as sewing machinists – accounted for 21 deaths (39.2)

By comparison, the rate for deaths involving Covid-19 among all women aged 20 to 64 was 16.8.

Other occupations with high death rates among women included:

– Sales and retail assistants (26.9 deaths per 100,000 females; 111 deaths)

– Social workers (32.4 deaths per 100,000 females; 25 deaths)

– Managers and directors in retail and wholesale (26.7 deaths per 100,000 females, 24 deaths)

Rates of death involving Covid-19 among male and female social care workers in 2020 were “statistically significantly higher” than those for the wider working population, the ONS said.

A total of 469 Covid-19 deaths among social care workers were registered in England and Wales, with rates of 79.0 deaths per 100,000 males and 35.9 deaths per 100,000 females.

Among healthcare workers – including doctors, nurses, ambulance staff and hospital porters – men had a statistically significant higher rate of death involving Covid-19 (44.9 deaths per 100,000 males), while for women the rate was not significantly different (17.3 deaths per 100,000).

The TUC claimed workplace Covid-19 deaths have been “vastly under-reported”.

General secretary Frances O’Grady said: “Everyone should be safe at work. But this pandemic has exposed huge inequalities in our labour market.

“People working in low-paid and insecure jobs have been forced to shoulder much higher risk, with too many losing their lives.

“The Government urgently needs to beef up its workplace safety guidance and get tough on employers who put their workers in harm’s way.”

Unison union general secretary Christina McAnea said the Government must guarantee proper pay for care workers who are ill or are having to self-isolate.

“Sick or self-isolating care staff and home care workers still feel forced to attend work by shameless employers,” she said.

“This is because they’re being denied full wages.

“This unacceptable situation puts staff at risk and the people they look after. It must end.”

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group