Uber UK wrote:
"Launching this pilot of Local cab in Plymouth is an exciting first step in connecting these riders with local operators so that eventually the Uber app can be used anywhere in the country.”
So how will this work with regard to fares, say? If Uber more expensive then not really in keeping with its claim to pricing transparency if they're charging more than the Plymouth firm for the same cab and driver.
But if Uber cheaper than the Plymouth firm then existing customers will soon get wise to fact that booking through Uber is getting the same cab and driver for a cheaper fare.
Anyway, no point rehashing all the earlier debate as to whether or not this will work out in the Plymouth firm's interests.
But, to underline another angle, surely this will just draw attention to the fact that Uber drivers are now categorised as 'workers', while the Plymouth firm's aren't (presumably). So that could be another way the Plymouth firm is cutting its own throat with this
And, for those who claimed that Uber's commission and non-cash model meant it was different from the mainstream trade, a couple of interesting nuggets on the Plymouth firm's website:
Need-A-Cab Plymouth wrote:
Good mix of cash and full rate account work
Account work paid in to Bank Account Every Monday
Blue chip Accounts inc. Arriva Trains, Cabfind, Wrigleys and Pcc Council
Need-A-Cab Plymouth wrote:
No Fixed Rent
Capped Commisssion (Pay as you Earn)
