Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 11:00 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:31 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Guess?
By the way, from the earlier thread it looked as if the Ayrshire council sets fares for all PH - very dody if you ask me!

http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=39167


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 6:09 pm
Posts: 1180
Location: Miles away from paradise, not far from hell.
I have e-mailed Edinburgh Council's licensing department to get the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, as to whether Edinburgh council can set PH fares. :wink:


Alex

_________________
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ

Simply the best taxi forum in the whole wide world. www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:26 pm
Posts: 850
Location: jock HQ
think that if your car has a taximeter fitted you will have to charge what is set on the tariff table and as sussex says his firm charge "taxi mettered fares" and a lot of other companys work that way as well


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:31 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Guess?
But councils can only do what they are allowed to do through legislation, so how can they tell you what to do inrelation to a PH car's fares when the legislation doesn't give them that power?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:26 pm
Posts: 850
Location: jock HQ
have a look.....

Section 17 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982

Section 17 -Taxi Fares


No legislative changes appear to be required here but the Task Group concluded that guidance is necessary, from either the Scottish Executive or CoSLA, in relation to the administrative charges levied by radio circuits in negotiated contracts. The Task Group found that it was fairly common practice for such administrative charges to be levied in addition to the fare displayed on the taximeter. However, the legislation is clear on this in that section 21(5) states that any person who demands fares or other charges in excess of scales established is guilty of an offence. Consequently such practice is illegal and these charges have to be either absorbed as part of the fare or the taximeter programmed to take account of the additional charges.

this is the link if you want a look
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultation ... lpc-05.asp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
It looks like to me the council are burring the edges between the taxi trade and the PH trade.

Quite a regular occurance, but always an illegal one. :shock:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Sussex wrote:
It looks like to me the council are burring the edges between the taxi trade and the PH trade.

Quite a regular occurance, but always an illegal one. :shock:


Gosh, whatever next? We'll soon be getting the PH trade "blurring the edges" and we wouldn't want that, would we? :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
jimbo wrote:
Gosh, whatever next? We'll soon be getting the PH trade "blurring the edges" and we wouldn't want that, would we? :roll:

The PH trade can only blur the edges with the support, either directly or indirectly, of the council. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:31 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Guess?
chipper wrote:
have a look.....

Section 17 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982

Section 17 -Taxi Fares


No legislative changes appear to be required here but the Task Group concluded that guidance is necessary, from either the Scottish Executive or CoSLA, in relation to the administrative charges levied by radio circuits in negotiated contracts. The Task Group found that it was fairly common practice for such administrative charges to be levied in addition to the fare displayed on the taximeter. However, the legislation is clear on this in that section 21(5) states that any person who demands fares or other charges in excess of scales established is guilty of an offence. Consequently such practice is illegal and these charges have to be either absorbed as part of the fare or the taximeter programmed to take account of the additional charges.

this is the link if you want a look
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultation ... lpc-05.asp


So Chip, are you saying that this means that councils are correct in controlling PH fares?

I think the fact that the review said that no changes were required and made no mention of councils controlling PH fares just shows how out of touch with things the "task group" was.

The legislation is quite distinct in its use of the words taxi and private hire, but in the Section 17 mentioned above says:

"The fares for the hire of taxis in any area.......shall be not greater than those fixed for that area under this section and section 18 of this Act."

No mention of PH there, and no other section in the Act that could possible give councils the power.

The book I have is written by a couple of advocates (barristers) and their notes say: "This section makes it mandatory for the licensing authority to fix maximum fares in relation to taxi hires, and provides for a regular review of the same. The section does not apply to private hire cars.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 5:37 pm
Posts: 809
Location: Cheshire
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, i wish i could work Edinborough for a week, i love a good row with a LA when i know he's wrong!!! :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 5:37 pm
Posts: 809
Location: Cheshire
Sorry i spelt Edinborough the ENGLISH way! :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:11 pm 
smiffyz (geoff) wrote:
Sorry i spelt Edinborough the ENGLISH way! :wink:

wot u mean its not in England? :shock:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:30 am
Posts: 52
smiffyz (geoff) wrote:
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, i wish i could work Edinborough for a week, i love a good row with a LA when i know he's wrong!!! :twisted:


If any person demands fares or other charges in respect of the hire of a taxi or for the hire of a private hire car which is fitted with a taximeter in excess of the scales established under sections 17 and 18 of this Act, he shall be guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding £2,500.

The Act being the Civic Government (Scotland) Act of 1982.

Regards

AG


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:31 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Guess?
That's interesting. As you may have noticed from my post the other day, it seems that there's no power to set fares for PHVs in sections 17 and 18, so presumably the offence referred to is irrelevant?

At the very least it seems like a massive contradiction in the Civic Govt Act.

Any ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Strange that up there a PH can be convicted of an offence that doesn't apply to them. :?

Maybe someone should ask the authorities what the existing PH tariff is. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerberus and 489 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group