Quote:
The proposals, agreed at a meeting of the council's licensing committee on Monday, will see the tariffs going up from £3.20 for the first three quarters of a mile up until midnight to £3.50, and from £3.50 for the first three quarters of a mile to £4 after midnight.
Maybe it's just me, but couldn't this be expressed a bit more clearly? Had to read it carefully a couple of times to make sense of it.
How about: "Before midnight the fare for the first three quarters of a mile will increase from £3.20 to £3.50", etc, etc
Licensing chair wrote:
“We need to have that balance between making it worthwhile to be a taxi driver whilst looking at the concerns of the taxi companies and drivers who don’t want us to overcharge."
Councillors 'overcharging'?
Makes it sound like councillors are on the streets asking passengers for the fares, not the drivers. And that they're charging more than the legal fare. I think she actually just means that councillors shouldn't be setting fares at too high a rate. 'Overcharge' is not a good word in this context.
Quote:
Garnock Valley councillor Donald L Reid said drivers were entitled to not charge less if they wished...
Um, I don't think the word 'not' should be there, so the meaning it totally the opposite to what it should be
And, on a political point, I thought the correct terminology in Scotland was 'convener' rather than 'chair'.
Not that it bothers me, because like Scottish banknotes and the like, it's potentially likely to confuse in some scenarios.
But some Scottish nationalists take grave offence at stuff like that
Mind you, I doubt if any of them who would froth at the mouth about stuff like chair v convener would notice the likes of a PHV in England being a PHC in Scotland, at least in terms of using the correct terminology in the legislation
(And let's not get started on chairman/woman etc. Which is perhaps why the article settles simply for 'chair'. At least the term 'convener' is, er, non-binary

)