Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 10:13 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Taxi fares hiked up 20% – but some Inverness operators say they don’t want it

https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/ne ... t-want-it/

Highland licensing committee has agreed to increase taxi fares by 20%, effective from 13 February 2023.

It followed a lively debate in which Inverness Taxi Alliance (ITA) said the rise is not justified.

While the ITA said their members don’t support a 20% increase, Highland Council officers said the review takes account of steep hikes in operating costs and fuel.

Members expressed their disappointment that only Inverness taxi operators made their case in the chamber.

Councillor Duncan Macpherson highlighted that licensing committee is for all of Highland, not just Inverness. He said the 20% proposal was reasonable and fair.

The issue went to a vote, with members voting nine to three in favour of the 20% hike.

Fare increase reflects steep rise in running costs for taxis

Following today’s decision, each tariff on the taxi fare will increase by up to 20%. This reflects the maximum that operators can charge, though they can choose to charge less.

Highland councillors also agreed to increase the cleaning charge to £150 and allow operators to charge £5 for bulky items that won’t fit in the boot (excluding wheelchairs and mobility aids).

The taxi fares review was brought forward at the specific request of some operators. They wrote to Highland Council asking them to make an early decision because of the increased costs of running their business.

Highland Council’s principal solicitor, Claire McArthur, said the 20% proposal reflects data from the consumer price index.

This showed the cost of buying a new vehicle has increased by 8%, and 22% for second-hand. Repairs and maintenance cost around 8% more and petrol and diesel are up by 58% and 59% respectively. This has since reduced a bit to 38% and 45%.

An initial survey of 93 operators showed that 95% supported a fare increase.

Inverness drivers say 20% is too much

However, the chairman and vice-chairman of Inverness Taxi Alliance told the licensing committee their members don’t support the rise.

Instead, they proposed range of increases from zero to a 15%, depending on the tariff.

ITA vice-chairman Duncan Fraser said the alliance represents 130 operators, none of which support a 20% fare increase. He said that while the cost of fuel has shot up, overall operating costs are about 12%.

“Taxi drivers are not poor,” he told councillors. “You could give them 50% today and they’d still be moaning to the public. It’s in their genes.”

Chairman Andrew MacDonald also said 20% is not reasonable. “That’s not an increase, it’s an imposition.”

Councillor Drew Millar said he had never known a taxi operator to speak at committee against a fare increase. However, he found their argument persuasive.

Referring to ongoing national pay disputes, Mr Millar questioned why teachers and nurses are fighting for 7% while Highland Council is volunteering a 20% rise for taxi drivers.

His comments prompted Ms McArthur to clarify that the council doesn’t set salaries; it only sets maximum tariffs.

‘They haven’t the foresight to see we’re protecting them’

Inverness councillor Duncan Macpherson defended the council’s proposals. Mr Macpherson said it was disappointing not to hear any voices from rural areas of Highland.

“We are the Highland licensing committee, not the Inverness licensing committee, and we have to look at things Highland-wide,” said Mr Macpherson.

Mr Fraser said he had reached out to operators in other areas including Thurso, but they held a strong anti-Inverness sentiment. One told him “Inverness will get whatever they want.” As a result, they failed to engage with the consultation.

Ms Macpherson countered that he had spoken to many operators outside of the city who were pleased with the 20% proposal.

Councillor Willie Mackay said motoring is never going to get any cheaper, and the committee should raise the fare tariff accordingly. He tabled a motion for the 20% increase, seconded by councillor Emma Knox.

Drew Millar called this rate “extortionate” and tabled an amendment supporting the ITA plan of a sliding scale up to 15%. This was seconded by councillor John Bruce.

Mr Mackay’s motion won the vote 9-3.

The new taxi fares structure will take effect from February.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
An initial survey of 93 operators showed that 95% supported a fare increase.

I suspect the ones voicing their concerns are the operators of the firms, not the drivers themselves.

Clearly, there is also a lot of politicking going on as well. :-k

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2022 11:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Quote:
Inverness councillor Duncan Macpherson defended the council’s proposals. Mr Macpherson said it was disappointing not to hear any voices from rural areas of Highland.

“We are the Highland licensing committee, not the Inverness licensing committee, and we have to look at things Highland-wide,” said Mr Macpherson.

Mr Fraser said he had reached out to operators in other areas including Thurso, but they held a strong anti-Inverness sentiment. One told him “Inverness will get whatever they want.” As a result, they failed to engage with the consultation.

Same old, same old from the Highland Council fare-setting process.

Maybe the councillors should consider the efficacy of a one-size-fits-all fare policy across a sparsely populated area that you could drive 200 miles to cross :idea:

Suspect the reason the non-Inverness trade doesn't get involved in the process is because, unlike the Inverness trade, they'll be doing a lot of discounted and off-meter stuff, so the whole tariff-setting process is largely an irrelevance to them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2022 2:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:57 am
Posts: 129
Only the taxi industry in Britain will be the only type of business to actually dispute a 20% fare increase by claiming it is too much.

Some people are just born to be trodden on.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 902 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group