This is a recent follow up article, but apart from the
type of offences involved in the revocations, there's not much new here.
Although there is a bit about police informing the licensing authorities about serious allegations pending a criminal process, or whatever.
But that still doesn't address why the revocations took so long in some cases. And neither does it say precisely what the vetting process is when it's not immediately a serious enough case to warrant police informing the licensing body.
So I'd guess some of them are a bit like what I often say about Glasgow etc - they're convicted of something, but it's only flagged up to the council when they're vetted during the renewal process. In which case they could be working the thick end of three years after the conviction if they've just been granted a licence, and it's only up for renewal a couple of years later.
So I think there's some vital information about the vetting process that's not specifically mentioned over the two pieces
Sex offences, assault and stolen goods - the offences committed by NI taxi drivers who kept licence after convictionhttps://www.irishnews.com/news/northern ... O5RX373EA/Call for ‘more rigorous’ monitoring of drivers after details emerge of disqualifying crimesSex offences and assault are among the convictions received by taxi drivers who were allowed to continue working, it has emerged.
Out of 12 drivers who had their taxi licence revoked in Northern Ireland between 2021 and 2025, at least one was convicted of a sexual offence.
Yet the minimum time between a disqualifying conviction and having a licence revoked in that period was three days, with the longest at almost five years.
The “concerning” crimes have come to light after the Irish News revealed in July that drivers were continuing to hold a taxi licence for periods despite receiving convictions that should immediately disqualify them.
Details of the offences behind those disqualifications have now been disclosed by Stormont’s infrastructure minister Liz Kimmins.
In a response to a written question from DUP MLA Gareth Wilson, the minister listed the 24 criminal convictions that led to the disqualification of 12 cabbies.
There were two convictions for sex offences; four for wounding/assault; six for possession of, or converting, criminal property; seven for fraud/forgery; four for drugs offences, and one for blackmail.
Mr Wilson had previously asked the minister for details of the time elapsed between the convictions and the Department for Infrastructure (DfI) revoking the offender’s taxi licence.
However, it is not yet known which of the criminal offences relate to the instances of time between conviction and revocation.
The shortest period was in 2021/22, when three days passed between conviction and revocation. That financial year also saw a 20 day period pass.
In 2022/23, four licences were revoked, with the shortest period since conviction 53 days, and the longest 2.3 years.
2023/24 saw three revocations, and elapsed time since convictions 50 days, 90 days, and 2.9 years.
For the three revocations in 2024/25, the elapsed time was 276 days, 672 days, and a staggering 1,805 days – almost five years.
The DfI previously told the Irish News that taxi drivers must alert the Driver & Vehicle Agency (DVA) of any new convictions arising during their licence period, but “there are some cases where this does not happen”.
However, with the revelation that a convicted sex offender held a taxi licence for a minimum of three days, and possibly much longer, Mr Wilson said it raises “questions about public safety and the effectiveness of the current system for monitoring taxi licence holders”.
“These are extremely serious matters and the public will rightly expect robust safeguards to be in place for those entrusted with transporting passengers,” the MLA told the Irish News.
“The vast majority of taxi drivers obey the law and carry out their work with the utmost integrity. However, given the position of trust that they hold, it is concerning that some drivers may have been able to continue to operate for significant periods of time after being convicted of serious offences.
“I believe there is a strong case for the Department to examine whether more rigorous and proactive monitoring arrangements are required, rather than relying so heavily on self-disclosure and checks at licence renewal stages.”
He added: “The public deserve transparency on these matters and, where weaknesses are identified, the Department must take steps to strengthen the system and ensure public safety is fully protected.”
The DfI was approached for further comment.
Minister Kimmins previously said that in “exceptional circumstances”, the PSNI, where it “considers it to be in the public interest”, may provide “information relating to arrests or charges” to the DVA while a taxi licence is in force.
“Such cases may result in an immediate suspension or refusal pending the outcome of court proceedings,” the minister advised.
It is not yet known on what date arrests or charges occurred over the two sex offences – nor the other serious offences – relating to licence revocations between 2021 and 2025.
A PSNI spokesperson said: “Where information relating to a licensed taxi driver gives rise to safeguarding or public protection concerns, consideration will be given to whether disclosure is necessary, proportionate and lawful.
“This includes allegations of a sexual nature, with each case considered on its individual circumstances and any potential risk to the public.”
Not all criminal convictions prevent a driver from achieving a taxi licence, nor lead to revocation, as the DVA considers each case individually.
Vetting concerns were previously raised after the 2024 jailing of a taxi driver for threatening a passenger with a firearm in an incident recorded on camera and leaked online. It emerged the driver had 66 previous criminal convictions.
In June of this year, the Irish News reported on fears that a driver who raped a woman in his taxi in 2010 could have been a serial sex offender – a concern raised by a detective in 2014, but which the PSNI refused to explore further in a review of cases.