Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 1:28 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 3:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:45 pm
Posts: 270
On the 3 May 2006 a senior licensing officer and members of the
Transport and General Workers Union, both Liverpool Branch and
national level officers, attended a meeting in London held with
senior civil servant at the Department for Transport responsible
Taxis.
At this meeting representations were made outlining the nature of
the level of private hire vehicles licensed by other district councils
waiting in Liverpool to be assigned calls. Issues of illegality
associated with private hire vehicles plying for hire were also aired.
During the meeting, copies of the full report considered by the
Licensing Committee and recommendations for changes in the law
concerning private hire activity were submitted to Mr David Farmer
the Head of the Bus and Taxi division of the DfT. Mr Farmer noted
the proposed change requested in the legislation by the
Committee and committed himself to speaking to Members of
Parliament and Ministers over the proposal.
Both the Union representatives and licensing officer discussed the
recent Office of Fair Trading report in to the taxi and private hire
trade in the UK and Mr Farmer stated that Liverpool had made “A
compelling argument in maintaining limits on hackney carriage
vehicle licences locally”. However the DfT remained committed to
district councils demonstrating the need and consumer benefit of
maintain any set limits.
Mr Farmer further stated that he did not foresee the Office of Fair
Trading revisiting the subject of taxi deregulation in the near future.

They went to London on the pretext , of trying to put an end to Sefton PH sitting in Liverpool waiting to be hired . They spent most of the time talking about , the OFT report. It seems they have got what they wanted from Mr Farmer, that the subject of Taxi deregulation will not be revisited . Mr Farmer stated that (Liverpool had made a compelling argument in maintaining limits on hackney s ) Why does he think that all those sefton PH are sitting in Liverpool . I give up. streetcars


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Interesting, VERY interesting.... if true...

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 4:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:45 pm
Posts: 270
jimbo wrote:
Interesting, VERY interesting.... if true...

Oh its true alright Jimbo. So it’s the end of the road for any body who wants to own a Taxi in Liverpool without taking a giant risk, in Liverpool its 50,000 to 65,000 plus for a cab and plate. It looks like yet again the vested interest of a few, wins over the poor down trodden many. How did they do that ?, go to London to discuss cross border hireings end up, talking about the OFT report clever . :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: Streetcars.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
From my experience civil servants will say what the person/people opposite want them to say.

And the person/people opposite the civil servants hear what they want to hear. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
streetcars wrote:


They went to London on the pretext , of trying to put an end to Sefton PH sitting in Liverpool waiting to be hired . They spent most of the time talking about , the OFT report. It seems they have got what they wanted from Mr Farmer, that the subject of Taxi deregulation will not be revisited . Mr Farmer stated that (Liverpool had made a compelling argument in maintaining limits on hackney s ) Why does he think that all those sefton PH are sitting in Liverpool . I give up. streetcars


Don't under estimate David Farmer, the DfT or the OFT. If you need to quote from any of those sources then it might be wise to quote from what is already in the public domain?

David Farmer does not make policy and he cannot change legislation. The representatives from Liverpool might think he can but they are sadly mistaken. If the same representatives think David Farmer can speak for John Fingleton of the OFT then again they are sadly mistaken.

From the DfT's previous correspondence in respect of those councils who still retain numbers control and their published consultation document on Best practice, it is quite clear where the DfT stands.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
JD wrote:
streetcars wrote:
They went to London on the pretext , of trying to put an end to Sefton PH sitting in Liverpool waiting to be hired . They spent most of the time talking about , the OFT report. It seems they have got what they wanted from Mr Farmer, that the subject of Taxi deregulation will not be revisited . Mr Farmer stated that (Liverpool had made a compelling argument in maintaining limits on hackney s ) Why does he think that all those sefton PH are sitting in Liverpool . I give up. streetcars


Don't under estimate David Farmer, the DfT or the OFT. If you need to quote from any of those sources then it might be wise to quote from what is already in the public domain?

David Farmer does not make policy and he cannot change legislation. The representatives from Liverpool might think he can but they are sadly mistaken. If the same representatives think David Farmer can speak for John Fingleton of the OFT then again they are sadly mistaken.

From the DfT's previous correspondence in respect of those councils who still retain numbers control and their published consultation document on Best practice, it is quite clear where the DfT stands.

Regards

JD

OK, JD, No need to shout! :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 8:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:45 pm
Posts: 270
JD wrote:
streetcars wrote:


They went to London on the pretext , of trying to put an end to Sefton PH sitting in Liverpool waiting to be hired . They spent most of the time talking about , the OFT report. It seems they have got what they wanted from Mr Farmer, that the subject of Taxi deregulation will not be revisited . Mr Farmer stated that (Liverpool had made a compelling argument in maintaining limits on hackney s ) Why does he think that all those sefton PH are sitting in Liverpool . I give up. streetcars


Don't under estimate David Farmer, the DfT or the OFT. If you need to quote from any of those sources then it might be wise to quote from what is already in the public domain?

David Farmer does not make policy and he cannot change legislation. The representatives from Liverpool might think he can but they are sadly mistaken. If the same representatives think David Farmer can speak for John Fingleton of the OFT then again they are sadly mistaken.

From the DfT's previous correspondence in respect of those councils who still retain numbers control and their published consultation document on Best practice, it is quite clear where the DfT stands.

Regards

JD
The source of Mr Farmers comments ,are on Liverpool councils web site, i suppose, in the public domain, admittedly in the agenda for the next committee meeting . Are you saying that you dont think, these are the veiws of Mr Farmer . Regards Streetcars .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
streetcars wrote:
The source of Mr Farmers comments,


Without taking a trip over to the Liverpool website myself, is it possible for someone who has already been there, to divulge the SOURCE of Mr Farmers comments?

I find it hard to believe that even Liverpool council would contemplate admitting hearsay comment from a taxi driver or drivers in respect of a Civil servent? The only true statment that can be relied upon is one written by Mr Farmer's own hand?

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 11:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:45 pm
Posts: 270
JD wrote:
streetcars wrote:
The source of Mr Farmers comments,


Without taking a trip over to the Liverpool website myself, is it possible for someone who has already been there, to divulge the SOURCE of Mr Farmers comments?

I find it hard to believe that even Liverpool council would contemplate admitting hearsay comment from a taxi driver or drivers in respect of a Civil servent? The only true statment that can be relied upon is one written by Mr Farmer's own hand?

Regards

JD
Perhaps members of Liverpool’s Taxi licensing committee may feel there being cynically manipulated by the vested interest in Liverpool. You would think they might find it strange that they approved a meeting with Mr. Farmer to discuss Sefton P H shafting Liverpool, they go down there. Then spend most of there time talking about a completely different subject . Are the people on this committee completly stupid. I will try to E-mail Mr Farmer to find out if these comments attributed to him are true. Perhaps these people may feel, they not only have the right to change the Law of the land, but can tell a load of lies as well.streetcars .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
Perhaps these people may feel, they not only have the right to change the Law of the land, but can tell a load of lies as well.


I seem to feel a deep seated mistrust of DELTA?

Quote:
David Farmer does not make policy and he cannot change legislation.


Errm, you ever watched 'Yes Minister' JD?

Captain cab

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
streetcars wrote:
Mr Farmer further stated that he did not foresee the Office of Fair Trading revisiting the subject of taxi deregulation in the near future.

Well according to June's Taxi'talk' a top bod at the T&G had a meeting with the DfT and was told the government supported deregulation/delimitation. :shock:

So either the T&G are lying about the first meeting, or they are lying about the last one. :-$

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Of course, we can't forget that, as ably demonstrated by JD's avatar, the T&G didn't seem to actually read the Govt's response to the OFT (and the NTA didn't read it properly), which perhaps explains some of the confusion.

It might be instructive to underline that the Govt's response said:

Quote:
The Government itself will review in association with the OFT the extent of quantity controls in three years' time to monitor progress towards the lifting of controls. If necessary, the Government will then explore further options through the RRO or legislative process if insufficient progress has been made.


I make that about spring next year :shock:

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
only took ten days to reply to this thread

hehe

sudden impact

Captain cab

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Problem was that it wasn't interesting enough to reply to (same old, same old) until the possibility of a contradiction arose. :)

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
At this meeting representations were made outlining the nature of
the level of private hire vehicles licensed by other district councils
waiting in Liverpool to be assigned calls. Issues of illegality
associated with private hire vehicles plying for hire were also aired.

During the meeting, copies of the full report considered by the
Licensing Committee and recommendations for changes in the law
concerning private hire activity were submitted to Mr David Farmer
the Head of the Bus and Taxi division of the DfT. Mr Farmer noted
the proposed change requested in the legislation by the
Committee and committed himself to speaking to Members of
Parliament and Ministers over the proposal.


We seem to have two differing things here, PH sitting in Liverpool (licensed in other districts) and Illegal plying for hire.

Changes in the law? shum mishtake shurly :shock:

Captain Cab

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 142 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group