Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 4:30 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 317 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 22  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 6:41 pm 
Dusty Bin wrote:
What I did object to (for example) was being banned from TTFUK for expressing the same views as I do on here.


I can't rember you being banned for expressing your opinion Mr Bin.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:01 pm 
Dusty Bin wrote:
As I've said continuously, you can spin things as the site being anti-T&G, but I think this is a bit simplistic.

But if that's the only argument you can come up with, then so be it.

Dusty


Mr Bin, this thread was discussing an issue. There was no "outside involvement" it was, as a forum should be, a friendly exchange of opinion.

Then all of a sudden, because you have nothing to add to such an exchange, you decide to resort to attacking a group that wasn't mentioned. You make your "anti" comments at every opportunity (learning slowly to spell) and as an administrator of this site that can be assumed to be the standpoint of it.

During your time on TTFUK you yourself calimed that the site shared the views of the administration and deemed it "anti" just about everything in attempt to give justification for your right to give your views without them being contradicted, as when they were you and your pal Sussex Man launched into a personal attack on whoever dared to question them.

I had thought that we had put this well and truly to bed, the simple fact of the matter is that your hatred is more deep rooted than anyone else's and you can't accept the fact that other people have changed opinions or become more understanding to other peoples views, through the knowledge they have gained through sites like these.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
Anonymous wrote:
I think certain people are just reaping what they have previously sown.


Well, when I speak Mr Guest it is on behalf of Sussex Man, and I look very much forward to reaping anything you wish.

However if you think TDO is anti T&G, well good. :D

I would much prefer something to be anti T&G, than anti 100,000+ PH drivers like CTN.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 8:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
Gateshead Angel wrote:
I had thought that we had put this well and truly to bed


Well it was until you, and the Yorkshire pud, bought it up.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 9:29 pm 
Dusty Bin wrote:
Quite right Mr Angel.

Take the T&G man in the Wirral, for example. Or those at Castle Point.

The sad thing is that the T&G seemed to be encouraging them to throw money at a lost cause.

Dusty


First mention of T&G within thread for quite some time.

The various points raised were being discussed without personal insult or referances to any organisation.

The administration saw another opportunity to slate the T&G and confirm the bias of the site.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2004 4:03 pm 
Sussex Man wrote:
Well, when I speak Mr Guest it is on behalf of Sussex Man, and I look very much forward to reaping anything you wish.


Is that refering to yourslf in the second person all together healthy.

Maybe more will be uncovered later, Wharfie would have a field-day making accusations following that quote.

Keeping a track on what name you are using must be very difficult.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2004 4:10 pm 
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Sussex Man wrote:
Well, when I speak Mr Guest it is on behalf of Sussex Man, and I look very much forward to reaping anything you wish.


Is that refering to yourslf in the second person all together healthy.

Maybe more will be uncovered later, Wharfie would have a field-day making accusations following that quote.

Keeping a track on what name you are using must be very difficult.

B. Lucky :twisted:



would he Mick?

what accusations could he make from that?

give him a clue


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2004 4:30 pm 
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Dusty Bin wrote:
What I did object to (for example) was being banned from TTFUK for expressing the same views as I do on here.


I can't rember you being banned for expressing your opinion Mr Bin.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Selective memory Mick, your weekness was barring people or trying to persuade them of thier views and bullying threats of legal action ect.

you went crazy when Andrew Peters left in a boo.

having said all that, we are left with from a forum where tAND g COULD DO NO WRONG TO A FORUM THATS WRECKED WITH FAR TOO MUCH UNFAIR CRITICISM ON THEM.

Cant we have a debate without slamming the T and G which gets in the way of real views.

the equipment section has beccome an advertising forum for Diplomat, there is a difference between giving merits of systems now full blown adverts are going up.

Yorkie


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2004 5:50 pm 
Yorkie wrote:
Selective memory Mick, your weekness was barring people or trying to persuade them of thier views and bullying threats of legal action ect.

you went crazy when Andrew Peters left in a boo.



Why did he leave Geoff, was it something I did or said?

Why did other members leave Geoff, was it something I did or said?

How many members were banned Geoff?

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2004 5:53 pm 
Yorkie wrote:
having said all that, we are left with from a forum where tAND g COULD DO NO WRONG TO A FORUM THATS WRECKED WITH FAR TOO MUCH UNFAIR CRITICISM ON THEM.


So am I to blame for trying to defend them, bearing in mind that you yourself seemed to agree with the critisism on more than one occasion and only support the T&G stance when it supports your own argument.

Brother ?

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2004 5:57 pm 
Yorkie wrote:
the equipment section has beccome an advertising forum for Diplomat, there is a difference between giving merits of systems now full blown adverts are going up.

Yorkie


I have no involvement in T&PH, I believe the site is now un-moderated and registered members only.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2004 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
noticed yorkies comment about the blatent advertising and got to agree,
but between talking about taxis and private hire, there's nothing more i like than the refreshing taste of Pepsi cola, satisfies my thirst every time.

regards

Captain Cab


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:30 am 
gedmay wrote:
If the Judicial review was so scathing about the cab trade can you tell me which party was awarded costs?
Ged


Ged, I suspect you new the answer to that question before you asked it lol but so did I. However, I also new there was a little more to it, thats why I said the council wasn't awarded costs. I know the accurate details but I would be interested to see if you do?

Best wishes.

John Davies
manchester


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2004 2:27 am 
Anonymous wrote:
Yorkie wrote:
having said all that, we are left with from a forum where tAND g COULD DO NO WRONG TO A FORUM THATS WRECKED WITH FAR TOO MUCH UNFAIR CRITICISM ON THEM.


So am I to blame for trying to defend them, bearing in mind that you yourself seemed to agree with the critisism on more than one occasion and only support the T&G stance when it supports your own argument.

Brother ?

B. Lucky :twisted:


yes Mick you are a very poor advocate, and the moral standpoint is dont defend the undefendable, the tand g general secretary does not do so.

if members are wrong they are wrong, its that basic.

you have a terrible habit of being in total ignorance of basic taxi principles
and therefore advocate actions that are unlawful.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2004 2:29 am 
Anonymous wrote:
Yorkie wrote:
Selective memory Mick, your weekness was barring people or trying to persuade them of thier views and bullying threats of legal action ect.

you went crazy when Andrew Peters left in a boo.



Why did he leave Geoff, was it something I did or said?

Why did other members leave Geoff, was it something I did or said?

How many members were banned Geoff?

B. Lucky :twisted:



enough to bring the site to colapse, all those who posted regularly, you could hear the roar of laughter from Sussex Andy right up in Dundee.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 317 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 22  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 328 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group