Taxi Driver Online

Taxi driver's appeal succeeds

A TAXI driver convicted of two motoring offences has been granted a licence to operate in St Albans in defiance of the council's wishes.

A licence application by Idris Siddique, of Wexham Close, Luton, was dismissed by the council in December last year after a Criminal Records Bureau check revealed convictions for deception and driving without insurance dating back to 2002.

That decision was upheld by the council's now defunct in-house appeals panel in February.

When the appeal eventually reached St Albans Magistrates Court earlier this month, the decision was overturned. Magistrates ruled that "on the balance of probabilities" Mr Siddique was now a fit and proper person and granted a licence.

The ruling has frustrated officers at St Albans City and District Council who say it is their job to protect the public.

Senior licensing officer Karren Hollands said: "Having proper insurance is a really important part of operating a taxi.

"If a driver with no insurance had an accident and a passenger was seriously injured, that could have very serious implications for them and their family.

"In this case, as the appeal took so long to get to court and the offences were from 2002, the magistrates saw fit to grant the application even though the council had twice decided otherwise."

Mrs Hollands insisted, however, that the public could have full confidence in the city's licenced drivers.

She added: "We are trying to protect the public who travel in taxis. Most of our drivers are fit and proper people who abide by the law. However, there is a small minority with a dubious past.

"At Christmas time in particular, when people are going out and enjoying themselves, they are more vulnerable - but we are working on their behalf to make sure they get home safely.

"I would urge people to check the vehicle they are getting into is a licensed taxi - it will have a plate to indicate this."

In recent months the district council has been successful in blocking a further two applications after drivers' criminal pasts were revealed.

The St Albans men, Mohammad Nisar Khan, of Dymoke Green, and Imraz Khan , of Howland Garth, were found to have a string of violent and drug related convictions and had their applications rejected - decisions later upheld by magistrates.

In response to the failure of Khan's legal representatives (Irfan Shah Solicitors) to turn up to his appeal hearing, the court demanded that £500 in costs be paid to the council.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin

Well they had best appeal it.

_________________
IDFIMH

This article is linked to the original revelation of the appeal by Sussex, which can be viewed here..

http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=5172

I don't know if this is a case of Councils know best or Magistrates know best but one thing is for sure and that is the magistrates won.

If you read between the lines of the circumstances surrounding the original offence it would appear to me that this mans story of how he obtained the forged insurance is far from convincing. However the point is being fit and proper to drive members of the public and as far as the Magistrates are concerned, he is.

Perhaps time will tell if the Magistrates were right or wrong?

Regards

JD

Someone has to make a decision and dont forget MAGISTRATES are appointed in effect by politicians!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
The views expressed by this contributor do not neccesarily reflect the policys of The GMB Nationally or of the GMB London Region.