T. wrote:
luke wrote:
Sussex wrote:
luke wrote:
whats a sports laywer doin with a taxi website. luke
When you get a mo ask Mr T and Mr GA, cos they have all the answers.

ok. luke
Does LUKE really exist ? Or is the post just a way of diverting from the initial topic. There is never any real debate on this site. It's just a forum for wannabee taxi owners (ie PH owners who lack the guts or aptitute to buy a plate and want degreg so they can join the club for nothing.) The B-Tech scheme is a franchise made to look like an educational course, it will do nothing to improve the trade. Some support it as a way of keeping out newcomers, to deter competition, fewer drivers mean more work for existing drivers. Councils like it because it relieves them of some of their responsibilities. But those running the B-Tech are it purly for the money, nothing wrong with making money, its the rubbish being talked to promote it that's wrong. The trade is being hoodwinked yet again.
So what's your solution, is it your wish that the Btec should be more stringent and incorporate items of legislation, English, numeracy and aptitude tests? Or do you want them abolished altogether so that anyone can obtain a license? At what level do you think quality controls should be set?
Its not very adult of you to throw a tantrum in another thread just because you didn't get the response you might have expected. If a Btec is being introduced in your licensed area then go do what the NTA GMBU and T&G advocate and consult with your council.
You can't blame us for your failings.
Regards
JD