Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 7:04 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 5:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:12 am
Posts: 590
Location: North Of The Tyne
Sussex wrote:
Don't take any dogs other than what the law says I should.

The dogs are bad enough, but from my experience the owners are the smelliest of the smellys.
:shock: Hey suss i,ve a dog :shock: what you trying to say man :oops: :-$ Balls it am ganna ave a bath man :shock:

_________________
www.youtube.com/watch?v=z07K29Fc15U


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
badger wrote:
Hey suss i,ve a dog :shock: what you trying to say man :oops: :-$ Balls it am ganna ave a bath man :shock:

I couldn't possibly comment. :roll: :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Dear (GBC),

Thank you for your email and for bringing to my attention your facts.

Would you please accept my apologise and be assured that any further
coverage involving this case will be amended. Any other cases will also
include the correct identification of the drivers status.

The errors arose based on information that I had received. Please be
assured this hasn't happened previously and wont happen again.

I agree and certainly can confirm that to the best of my knowledge this
type of discrimination has not been brought to my attention when
involving a Licensed London Taxi driver.

Thank you and again I sincerely apologise.

Bill.

Bill Alker
RNIB PRESS OFFICE
MON-TUE 020 7391 2223
WED-THUR-FRI 0115 9871522


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Blind Justice
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
jimbo wrote:
Skull wrote:
JD wrote:
May 10, 2007 Thursday

Ali convicted.

TDO highlighted this incident several months ago and it is no surprise this gentleman was found guilty. Liakath Ali refused to pick up a blind woman claiming he was allergic to dog hair but has been convicted under the DDA.


Ali faces losing his licence after turning down Paula Thomas, 32. She said he failed to tell her about his allergy and had no medical note displayed in his taxi.

Ali was found guilty of refusing to carry out a booking at Westminster Magistrates Court. He will be sentenced on June 8.

Royal National Institute for the Blind employee Paula said afterwards: "I was very upset and hurt."
________________________________


Quote:
Paula Thomas, 32. She said he failed to tell her about his allergy and had no medical note displayed in his taxi.


I hate to point this out but how would she know there was no ‘medical note’ in his taxi?

It seems to me her memory is very good when it comes to remembering things she can’t see but explicit when it comes to things she wasn’t told.

BTW, before anybody goes off on one I am just pointing out the obvious flaw in her story. :wink:



And I hate to point out to you Mr Skull, That she said the driver "FAILED TO TELL HER ABOUT HIS ALLERGY" There's a clue in the word TELL you numbskull you. BTW, I have a blind relative who greets everyone with a "nice to see you" it don't mean that he can.


“She said he failed to tell her about his allergy and had no medical note displayed in his taxi”.

Firstly this is not an unambiguous piece of writing and secondly, “to tell” is spoken – “and had no medical note displayed” referrers to what can actually be seen with the naked eye.

Now tell me Jimbo, would your blind relative having witnessed a bank robbery make a statement concerning what she had seen, or what she had heard?

I don’t believe this person did not have any dialogue with the cabby other than being told he did not take dogs. No one would refuse a blind person without some kind of excuse, knowing the potential consequences of their actions.


BTW Jimbo, blind people tell lies too, and so do people from other disabled groups. I know of numerous occasions where this has happened, and like you Jimbo, they attempt to use disability as a weapon to beat people with.

Using your blind relative to score a point makes you just as desperate as they are- pri*k
:wink:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
If you "don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby" What exactly do you believe? Double negative, Frisp.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
jimbo wrote:
If you "don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby" What exactly do you believe? Double negative, Frisp.


"other than being told he did not take dogs"

What, no more disabled relatives to dig-up? :lol: :lol:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
If you "don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby" What exactly do you believe? Double negative, Frisp.


"other than being told he did not take dogs"

What, no more disabled relatives to dig-up? :lol: :lol:


"I don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby"

You therefore do believe that this person did have dialogue with this cabby?

Don't be personal now, Frisp.

And note that you do not have to be blind to be registered blind. So it's entirely possible for a "blind" person to be a witness to a bank robbery.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
jimbo wrote:
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
If you "don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby" What exactly do you believe? Double negative, Frisp.


"other than being told he did not take dogs"

What, no more disabled relatives to dig-up? :lol: :lol:


"I don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby"

Quote:
You therefore do believe that this person did have dialogue with this cabby?


Yes


And note that you do not have to be blind to be registered blind. So it's entirely possible for a "blind" person to be a witness to a bank robbery.


A reliable witness to what he has seen - I doubt it? 8)

I can just see it now:

Please madam, could you and your blind dog pick the bank robber out of the line-up.

Or

Please madam, can you point to the robber sitting in this court and maybe your dog could give him a sniff :roll:

Aye right Jimbo keep taking the drugs :lol:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 6:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
If you "don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby" What exactly do you believe? Double negative, Frisp.


"other than being told he did not take dogs"

What, no more disabled relatives to dig-up? :lol: :lol:


"I don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby"

Quote:
You therefore do believe that this person did have dialogue with this cabby?


Yes


And note that you do not have to be blind to be registered blind. So it's entirely possible for a "blind" person to be a witness to a bank robbery.


A reliable witness to what he has seen - I doubt it? 8)

I can just see it now:

Please madam, could you and your blind dog pick the bank robber out of the line-up.

Or

Please madam, can you point to the robber sitting in this court and maybe your dog could give him a sniff :roll:

Aye right Jimbo keep taking the drugs :lol:



Could you just take the time to point out where I said the word "reliable"?

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
jimbo wrote:
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
If you "don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby" What exactly do you believe? Double negative, Frisp.


"other than being told he did not take dogs"

What, no more disabled relatives to dig-up? :lol: :lol:


"I don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby"

Quote:
You therefore do believe that this person did have dialogue with this cabby?


Yes


And note that you do not have to be blind to be registered blind. So it's entirely possible for a "blind" person to be a witness to a bank robbery.


A reliable witness to what he has seen - I doubt it? 8)

I can just see it now:

Please madam, could you and your blind dog pick the bank robber out of the line-up.

Or

Please madam, can you point to the robber sitting in this court and maybe your dog could give him a sniff :roll:

Aye right Jimbo keep taking the drugs :lol:



Could you just take the time to point out where I said the word "reliable"?


I think if you look at my post again you will see it is a question.

BTW, I don’t think there is much point in having a witness who is unreliable, unless you are claiming there is of course?

Let me put it another way Jimbo ; I wouldn't want to depend on what your blind relative has seen as a witness to a murder, of which I was accused of, but didn’t commit. :roll:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
If you "don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby" What exactly do you believe? Double negative, Frisp.


"other than being told he did not take dogs"

What, no more disabled relatives to dig-up? :lol: :lol:


"I don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby"

Quote:
You therefore do believe that this person did have dialogue with this cabby?


Yes


And note that you do not have to be blind to be registered blind. So it's entirely possible for a "blind" person to be a witness to a bank robbery.


A reliable witness to what he has seen - I doubt it? 8)

I can just see it now:

Please madam, could you and your blind dog pick the bank robber out of the line-up.

Or

Please madam, can you point to the robber sitting in this court and maybe your dog could give him a sniff :roll:

Aye right Jimbo keep taking the drugs :lol:



Could you just take the time to point out where I said the word "reliable"?


I think if you look at my post again you will see it is a question.

BTW, I don’t think there is much point in having a witness who is unreliable, unless you are claiming there is of course?

Let me put it another way Jimbo ; I wouldn't want to depend on what your blind relative has seen as a witness to a murder, of which I was accused of, but didn’t commit. :roll:


See Skull, when you stop being so damn bloody minded, you actually start being sensible. I believe that a registered blind person would be discredited by a smartarse lawyer no matter what they saw. The reliaboility of a witness will always be questioned by a defence lawyer, and any available loophole will be exploited. But if your Mother/Father/Son/Daughter were (God forbid) murdered, and some scumbag lawyer got the defendant off using "poor eyesight" need I go further...?

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
jimbo wrote:
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
Skull wrote:
jimbo wrote:
If you "don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby" What exactly do you believe? Double negative, Frisp.


"other than being told he did not take dogs"

What, no more disabled relatives to dig-up? :lol: :lol:


"I don't believe this person did not have any dialogue with this cabby"

Quote:
You therefore do believe that this person did have dialogue with this cabby?


Yes


And note that you do not have to be blind to be registered blind. So it's entirely possible for a "blind" person to be a witness to a bank robbery.


A reliable witness to what he has seen - I doubt it? 8)

I can just see it now:

Please madam, could you and your blind dog pick the bank robber out of the line-up.

Or

Please madam, can you point to the robber sitting in this court and maybe your dog could give him a sniff :roll:

Aye right Jimbo keep taking the drugs :lol:



Could you just take the time to point out where I said the word "reliable"?


I think if you look at my post again you will see it is a question.

BTW, I don’t think there is much point in having a witness who is unreliable, unless you are claiming there is of course?

Let me put it another way Jimbo ; I wouldn't want to depend on what your blind relative has seen as a witness to a murder, of which I was accused of, but didn’t commit. :roll:


See Skull, when you stop being so damn bloody minded, you actually start being sensible. I believe that a registered blind person would be discredited by a smartarse lawyer no matter what they saw. The reliaboility of a witness will always be questioned by a defence lawyer, and any available loophole will be exploited. But if your Mother/Father/Son/Daughter were (God forbid) murdered, and some scumbag lawyer got the defendant off using "poor eyesight" need I go further...?


No problem with that at all :wink:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 274 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group