Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 9:18 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Bristol Evening Post

June 18, 2007 Monday

Woman hangs out as taxi takes off

A Taxi driver sped off with a woman hanging half out of his open door after illegally picking her up, a court heard.

Somalian-born Amil Yusuf, 31, of Newtown, in Bristol, picked up siblings Luke and Tanya Bird in Prince Street despite not having the right kind of taxi licence.


When licensing officers from Bristol City Council pulled alongside as Tanya climbed in, he sped off with her hanging half in, half out of the car.

Bristol Magistrates' Court heard Yusuf was a private hire driver at the time and could only respond to calls made to him, rather than picking people up from the street.

Afterwards Ms Bird was left shaken but not hurt, the court heard.

At his sentencing, prosecutor Kemi Okunnu told the bench Yusuf was driving his silver Toyota Avensis saloon when it happened.

She said: "When Mr Yusuf was parked on a line in Prince Street, Luke and Tanya Bird approached him and asked him to take them to Bedminster.

"As Tanya climbed in, two licensing officers pulled up alongside.

"Mr Yusuf then sped off as Ms Bird was trying to get into the car."

The court heard she was left with her legs dangling out of the car as it sped off up the road.

Ms Okunnu said Yusuf stopped suddenly, then drove off again before swerving in front of another car. When interviewed afterwards, Yusuf alleged he had been working and simply stopped by the couple to make a phone call, she said.

Yusuf was convicted of dangerous driving, being uninsured to carry passengers he picked up from the street, and plying for hire as a Hackney carriage at a previous hearing.

The court heard Yusuf was a taxi driver and worked at the Ikea furniture store in Easton to make ends meet.

A Dutch national, he lives with his brother and otherwise had a clean driving record, the court was told.

The incident happened at 1.20am on July 2, 2006.

Mitigating, Yusuf's solicitor, David Barnes, asked the bench to give him a curfew or a suspended sentence, rather than sending him to jail.

He said: "The incident did happen late at night. No damage or injuries were caused.

"The person involved was extremely shaken up but not injured.

"I realise you have custody in mind but I would suggest a curfew order would be in order."

Sentencing, Terry Houlford, the chairman of the bench, told Yusuf: "You were in a job where you were dealing with the public, and, as such, you were in a position of trust with regard to the people whom you were driving, and you breached this trust.

"This incident could have had fatal results. The lady could have been killed."

But he said the mitigating circumstances were that Yusuf had a clean licence.

He handed Yusuf a four-month jail sentence suspended for 12 months.

If he commits another offence in that year, he could be taken back to court and jailed for both.

He was also disqualified from driving for a year at a previous hearing on May 18, and the bench confirmed the ban, saying he would have to sit an extended driving test if he wanted to get behind the wheel again.

Yusuf also received a six-month curfew from 7pm to 7am, during which time he will be tagged.

He was also told to pay the £400 prosecution costs.
__________________________________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57341
Location: 1066 Country
A relative of mine use to drive PH in Bristol, and the stories he tells about many PH drivers and most PH operators then are very scary. :sad:

It appears some haven't changed. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Sussex wrote:
A relative of mine use to drive PH in Bristol, and the stories he tells about many PH drivers and most PH operators then are very scary. :sad:

It appears some haven't changed. :sad:


And yet you would have us believe that de-limiting the number of Hackney Carriages ends illigal plying for hire?Not in Bristol, it would seem. :? :? :?

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57341
Location: 1066 Country
jimbo wrote:
And yet you would have us believe that de-limiting the number of Hackney Carriages ends illigal plying for hire?Not in Bristol, it would seem. :? :? :?

Well the more folks are picked up on the road by legal cabs the better. The more legal cabs that can pick up the better.

If this mush was legal then he wouldn't have tried to escape and nearly kill the punter.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
jimbo wrote:
And yet you would have us believe that de-limiting the number of Hackney Carriages ends illigal plying for hire?Not in Bristol, it would seem. :? :? :?


Bristol is restricted.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: City of dreaming spires
no bristol was re restricted after the free for all brigade had thier noses put out of joint


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
187ums wrote:
no bristol was re restricted after the free for all brigade had thier noses put out of joint


Is there an echo in here?

Six year old kids can spell their so why can't you? lol

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 253
Location: Crawley
JD wrote:
187ums wrote:
no bristol was re restricted after the free for all brigade had thier noses put out of joint


Is there an echo in here?

Six year old kids can spell their so why can't you? lol

JD


187ums look what's happened : you disagreed with and corrected JD so you get a comment aimed at you personally for your supposed poor spelling , however we all got the meaning of what you were saying anyway so it really was pedantic to even bother pointing it out.

Best wishes

_________________
Our safety is Paramount


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:16 am 
Taxis are about taking customers from A to B. PHC seems somewhat similar, I can't really understand the difference.

Seems simple to me. What we need is a single licensing system.

Total equality where the taxi operator has access to the particular vehicle type needed to serve a particular market niche.

What we really have is a politician's over complication. Two licence types, doing substantially the same job.

One system, with the higher standards of the Hackney trade. The trade benefits. Customers benefit. What's the problem?

:?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Where did he correct me?

I said Bristol is restricted and it has been for several years so perhaps you can explain yourself? Mr. 187UMS, like me, also said it was restricted so just exactly what was the point of his post, apart from highlighting the fact he can’t spell elementary words such as their?

I don't normally make an issue of pointing out other peoples spelling mistakes but Mr. 187ums likes to be reminded of his failings in life. Spelling simple words and mimicking others are just two of those failings.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57341
Location: 1066 Country
187ums wrote:
no bristol was re restricted after the free for all brigade had thier noses put out of joint

And do you know why Bristol was de-limited?

And do you know the backgrounds of those 'free for all' brigade? [-X

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: City of dreaming spires
its ok jd, i can sit here and point out your spelling mistakes all day, i can point out your elemental grammar mistakes, but i dont, the point is you are a d ick head, and everyone knows it.

oh and just before i go, its "re restricted" i.e. it was "de restricted" d ick head, get it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
187ums wrote:
its ok jd, i can sit here and point out your spelling mistakes all day, i can point out your elemental grammar mistakes, but i dont, the point is you are a d ick head, and everyone knows it.

oh and just before i go, its "re restricted" i.e. it was "de restricted" d ick head, get it?


The quantity control history of Bristol is well documented on TDO so I don't think we need any misleading diversions from you on the subject.

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57341
Location: 1066 Country
Sussex wrote:
187ums wrote:
no bristol was re restricted after the free for all brigade had thier noses put out of joint

And do you know why Bristol was de-limited?

And do you know the backgrounds of those 'free for all' brigade? [-X

I take that as a no then Mr 187ums. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: City of dreaming spires
Quote:
I take that as a no then Mr 187ums

please do explain.....but then explain why it was "re restricted"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 521 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group