Quote:
A few days later, Atif was contacted by Wolverhampton Council - who hand out Uber licences - telling him he was banned from driving Ubers for drug usage following customer complaints.
Oh, aye - the council suspended or revoked him just like that?
Near the end of the article, the driver wrote:
"It's very difficult. There's nothing I can do. I'm working with a cab company but it's not the same as Uber, it's not as busy."
Oh
At then end of the article, CoventryLive wrote:
A spokesman for City of Wolverhampton Council said: “Mr Khan is a private hire driver licensed with Wolverhampton City Council.”
Oh. So he was never actually suspended or revoked at all, then?
Changes the whole complexion of the article if it had said at the outset that he'd only been banned by Uber rather than suspended or revoked by the council.
And certainly looks unfair on the driver if what he says is true, but let's get the facts straight
