les mcvay wrote:
The STF has made a decision to make a donation of £5,000 towards CRT legal expenses for objecting to an operation that has already existed at the Airport for the past 5 years and that is to be run by a company that already has booking office licenses at the airport and, more importantly for us, they were objecting to an operation that they themselves were willing to provide if they had been successful. That is why City Cabs could not back it.
".
Les only please ,could you answer the following honestly.
Do you believe the Onward travel rank needed to be fenced off in inception to comply with the CGA 1982 ?
Is it true the CRT and City backed off the onward operation when FTS were awarded the rank ?
Do you think,given your experience in trade matters, that the new proposed set up in the former drop off area will be Legally compliant ?
Do you feel a similar operation could operate in say the Waverley with Private hire drivers ranked( lined up, parked etc) along side Black cabs would be legally compliant ?
You have stated you could not back the STF's support and financial award towards CRT due to an alleged proposed operation/tender put forward by CRT themselves, Did CRT and City not both have a PH solution in their tender submissions as it was mandatory for the airports vision/solution in which both would have taken in the onward fleet (you'll have the pictures from Ocean Terminal to prove it ) as they were a ready made solution and most importantly to the trade, ALL BRIEF HOLDERS ?
If the rumours are to be believed also about the upcoming greenway review, will you and City cabs support,abstain or object to the PH gaining access to the Greenways ?
Finally,You have in the past be at the forefront of our trade against the PH even voicing your dislike of Mr Woodburn at trade meetings he shouldn't be involved in, is it purely commercial that your views and opinions appear to have charged or is there another reason ?
Thanks in advance
Where has Les gone ? He preaches openness and transparently yet has failed to answer a few questions. I wonder if he has calmed down now that the current committee are standing un-opposed thus safeguarding his position?
It's ok though because Boabs came out of hiding to answer the questions or deflect it from him for his retainer..
If anyone wants to ask the questions of the CRT committee they can go in to the office without fear of retribution unlike others. So why don't you get a couple of your ex-colleagues Boab to go in and ask the questions for you ?