bloodnock wrote:
gusmac wrote:
**** accusations from Scotland's last tories
Really funny when you consider who their allies are
http://newsnetscotland.com/index.php/sc ... ce-partiesBloodnock, your historical accuracy leaves much to be desired, just like your political observations.
Hitler became chancellor of Germany in January 1933.
If you want to know any more about nazis, try asking your allies in the no camp.
Im not wrong.....Hitler may have become chancellor in In 1933 but at that point the Nazis were not the Majority party in Government...it was In 1934 when Hitler founded a separate body for the chairman, Chancellery of the Führer, with its own sub-units, and thats when the **** party took over complete political power in Germany and with it German Democracy flew out the Window..
Also...do you really think for one second that in the unlikely event of an independant Scotland that its Political System will not Include a Conservative party? the Truth is that a nation Run by only one party is doomed to failure from the outset....and that aint gonna happen because there are more voters of Tory, Labour, Liberal and others parties combined that they out number the Nasty Party over all.
Im sorry for your inability to accept your delusions of becoming an Independant Scotland..but hey!!..none of us are perfect

I bow to your superior knowledge of **** party history. No doubt gleaned from all those BNP/EDL/
Mein Kampf readers you find yourself in agreement with.
As for delusional Bloodnock, take a look in the mirror.
There are supporters of independence everywhere, in all walks of life, in all the mainstream "unionist" parties and even more amongst their supporters.
For the Scottish Conservatives, independence will give then the chance to throw off the shackles of tory central in London and re-invent themselves.
They will probably move more to the centre ground of Scottish politics and flourish for it, casting off the curse of Thatcher in the process. They will get back much of the vote they have lost to the liberals and, to a lesser extent, the SNP.
For the remote controlled Scottish Labour party, a chance to actually be a socialist party, instead of the slightly pink shade of blue the UK party has foisted on them in order to be electable down south.
They too will gain support from their more traditional territory, at the expense of the SSP and the SNP.
The liberals/democrats/whatever we call ourselves today party are the one's with the biggest problem come independence.
The Tories are going to move into their comfort zone from the right, and from the left they will have what's left of the SNP along with a rejuvinated and more left wing labour party.
As for the SNP, they are currently too broad a church to survive much past independence, at least not as they are.
They will continue through the independence negotiations and the drafting of a Scottish constitution.
After that, their
raison d'être has gone, and they too will have to evolve into more than a vehicle for independence.
This will break up the broad church and leave a rump with a similar agenda. Many of the SNP supporters will return to the political mainstream.
So, Bloodnock, no one party state, no jack-booted storm troopers coming in the night to sieze your haggis and irn-bru, no razor-wire and machine gun borders and no death camps.
You'll even be able to watch the BBC like the Irish, without paying the licence fee
