Skull wrote:
Not like you to take my response out of context, but I am big enough to say. I caused the misunderstanding.
We'll that's big of you.
skull wrote:
Independence played no part in their new democratic model
skull wrote:
gusmac wrote:
Now, do you think
skull wrote:
Iceland could be the start of the new democratic model for the world
if they were not an independent nation?
Yes or no will do.
NO.
So which one is it Skull?
Quote:
You don't have an argument to put forward for Independence, anymore than you understand how the real world works.
I have a better idea how it works that you do, clearly. Your the one chopping and changing your mind to suit whichever delusional state you happen to be in.
Quote:
I tell you the truth, and you come back with shi*e, one could say, you are a typical SNP, supporter.
You tell me what you THINK is the truth Skull. THINK being the operative term.
Perhaps it's time that you opened your mind to the possibility that you might actually be wrong and there is more to all this than just the gospel according to Skull.
Quote:
Are you really naive enough to believe the UK government wouldn't step in to restore order in a part of what they claim is their own country? If people like you were stupid enough to give them an excuse?
They did it in Ireland when the stakes were far lower than they are in Scotland, and carried it on for 25 years in the face of world condemnation.
What did they have to gain then? The undying loyalty of some orangemen and a country which was falling apart at the seems?
They've fought questionable or illegal wars everywhere from the Falklands to Iraq, Afghanistan to Libya over oil. Maybe Iran next.
You imagine they wouldn't risk a little international outrage to keep control of 90% of their domestic oil supply?
Naive and delusional.
And you think I don't know how the world works.
