swannee wrote:
I never said that it was a little bit. I did say existing licence holders would pay a little bit less (meaning less than they would have otherwise - is what you misunderstood)
Depends what you're taking as the benchmark, but surely the obvious comparison is the fee for new applications?
Anyway, you said that new applicants should pay
a bit more, which is still utterly ridiculous with regard to £1,300 or so.
Quote:
Frivolous applications are those made without the applicant having a genuine desire to invest in a business but trying to make a fast buck or destroy others by so applying.
Did you miss the
PH bit in what I've been saying?
How would they make a fast buck? Do you mean by being a better profiteer than you?
And if closed market you support wasn't in place you the actions you criticise wouldn't be possible, so surely it's just playing by your own rules?
Quote:
I never said fees represent market forces. If you feel an investment in licence will give you a good enough return then you go for it. Market forces or your interpetation of them determine that return. Not a scam, more a deterrent to frivolity!

I think you're lacking in understanding of what constitutes market forces. In the real world at least. And if a plate was a genuine 'investment' you wouldn't be so touchy about anyone criticising the whole gig.
Anyway, surely the fees should bear some reflection to the
costs involved?
The fees in question self-evidently don't.
Quote:
Cartel? Get real son
Oh I'm totally familiar with the real world, Dad, and you're certainly miles away from it.