Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 12:51 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
I think they could in light of whats happened, or possibly raise there premiums for them.
If they where to reject them LTI would be well fecked, and what would the PCO do then


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
skippy41 wrote:
I think they could in light of whats happened, or possibly raise there premiums for them.
If they where to reject them LTI would be well fecked, and what would the PCO do then


They could but it seems unlikely. Insurance companies work on risk and there will always be someone who will take on the risk.
An increased risk will almost certainly mean increased premiums.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:23 pm 
Except, product recalls happen in all walks of commercial life.

The problem's been found. LTI are dealing with it. The vehicles will not be allowed back into fleets until and unless it is fixed.

So what's the need for increased insurance premiums?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
skippy41 wrote:
I think they could in light of whats happened, or possibly raise there premiums for them.
If they where to reject them LTI would be well fecked, and what would the PCO do then

I expect LTI's insurance will increase many fold over the next few years, but there will always be someone prepared, for a price, to insure anyone or anything.

But I suppose there is a good chance TX vehicle insurance will increase ahead of non TX vehicle insurance.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 1:19 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Essex
Most of public hire insurance is on public liability not the vehicle, there's not much difference in the insurance for an old fairway and a new tx4 with the same driver, maybe 5-6 quid a week.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
gbadge wrote:
Most of public hire insurance is on
Quote:
public liability
not the vehicle, there's not much difference in the insurance for an old fairway and a new tx4 with the same driver, maybe 5-6 quid a week.


Thats where they could hit owners, public liability, insurance companies would not want anyone to be trapped and burned in the back of one


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
jasbar wrote:
Except, product recalls happen in all walks of commercial life.

The problem's been found. LTI are dealing with it. The vehicles will not be allowed back into fleets until and unless it is fixed.

So what's the need for increased insurance premiums?


I suppose it depends on whether the underwriters believe the problem is solved or not.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:06 am 
gusmac wrote:
jasbar wrote:
Except, product recalls happen in all walks of commercial life.

The problem's been found. LTI are dealing with it. The vehicles will not be allowed back into fleets until and unless it is fixed.

So what's the need for increased insurance premiums?


I suppose it depends on whether the underwriters believe the problem is solved or not.


With the cars not being allowed to ply for hire until and unless it's proved to the regulatory authorities, effectively the passing of an MOT test, only more severe?

These cars get back into the fleet, then the insurance companies can't claim they're defective and deserving of a higher risk premium.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
jasbar wrote:
gusmac wrote:
jasbar wrote:
Except, product recalls happen in all walks of commercial life.

The problem's been found. LTI are dealing with it. The vehicles will not be allowed back into fleets until and unless it is fixed.

So what's the need for increased insurance premiums?


I suppose it depends on whether the underwriters believe the problem is solved or not.


With the cars not being allowed to ply for hire until and unless it's proved to the regulatory authorities, effectively the passing of an MOT test, only more severe?

These cars get back into the fleet, then the insurance companies can't claim they're defective and deserving of a higher risk premium.


Didn't these vehicles already pass similar tests before they ever hit the road? The (allegedly) defective parts only came to light after they had been in service for some considerable time. It could be just as long before we can tell if these "modifications" are any better than the parts being replaced.
The fitting of a "fire suppresion system" just exudes confidence, don't you think? :roll:

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 4:19 am 
No confidence, or proof, in the mod, then they don't get on the road. End of.

No reason for insurance hike. End of.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
jasbar wrote:
Except, product recalls happen in all walks of commercial life.

The problem's been found. LTI are dealing with it. The vehicles will not be allowed back into fleets until and unless it is fixed.

So what's the need for increased insurance premiums?


That's just the drowning skippy clutching at straws again, in his tireless (or tiresome) crusade against LTI.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerberus and 309 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group