captain cab wrote:
jasbar wrote:
But then, that's why restriction is retained. Cos the greedos know they're wrong and couldn't run the risk of being proven so.
Aye, and the council deem there is 'no significant unmet demand'
Whacko
CC
And the queues requiring taxi marshalls? Oops, how can someone queuing possibly be a demand that's not being met?
And those who have to walk two miles at one o'clock in the morning before being able to hail a taxi?
And the radio companies who fail to answer their fones at peak periods?
And the dearth of rush hour taxis because it coincides with shift changeover?
And the meteoric rise in private hire? In my 15 years in the trade taxis in Edinburgh went from 1030 to now just 1280 - a rise of around 25%. PH have gone from around 300 to now around 1000 - a whopping 250%. Precisely what "no significant unmet demand" for taxi services in the area is PH servicing then?
How is there no demand when Edinburgh's economy was "burgeoning", attested to by the city's council leader, experts like the Swiss Bakel economics think tank, and numerous other respected commentators and institutions.
When tourism has grown exponentially? When the number of city centre hotel rooms has doubled? When Edinburgh's airport has become Scotland's busiest, handling more passengers than even Glasgow?
When the Parliament has brought vastly increased political and economic activity?
When the council has introduced, and extended, its own taxi bus service to the airport and back to all points within the city?
No significant unmet demand?
Councils aren't about proving demand levels with surveys. They use surveys to restrict taxis, because the own the competitor bus company.
This wouldn't be allowed anywhere else in the economy.
That's why politicians are filthy, lying scum. Does anyone doubt their motives are less than honest?
That's why they will lose this fight. However long it takes.