Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 5:08 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
whats "section 6"?

It's a section of the PSV act that certain naughty boys are trying to use to get around all this licensing lark. [-X

But it's a scam that even the Limo Association think is a scam.

Maybe that's why the 'burn and claim' scam is now used a tad more. :shock:


Since when has the limo association thought it is a scam? I think you have that wrong Sussex. Just how many prosecutions have arisen from operators working under schedule 6 rules? In fact if I remember rightly, in January when the contract exemption came into force you thought that unlicenced limos would be taken off the road but that hasn't happened either has it?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
Since when has the limo association thought it is a scam? ?

Admittedly they don't say that on the record, but both of us know off the record is a different issue.

The site says;

Schedule six domestic minibus

Many of the larger limousines derived from the 4X4 sports utility vehicles have now been adapted to meet these regulations. They may be hired to the client only as self drive vehicles, the driver must come from a totally independent source, and provided that they are insured as self drive then they may legally carry up to the number of passengers displayed on the plate on the vehicle.

These vehicles must not be offered with the services of a driver, as this would then constitute hire and reward and would therefore not be legal.


Now I suspect less than 1% of limo hires using the scam are operating under the above rules, which in itself I think are illegal.

Or would you like to put your guess of a % up? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
Just how many prosecutions have arisen from operators working under schedule 6 rules?

Not enough, but then again the enforcement activities of VOSA are an utter disgrace.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
In fact if I remember rightly, in January when the contract exemption came into force you thought that unlicenced limos would be taken off the road but that hasn't happened either has it?

So you must be the only person in the UK that thinks there are the same number of unlicensed stretch limos as before Jan this year. :shock:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 12:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
is there any fundamental reason why a limo (and i refer to, say, a stretch yank, LHD,etc) shouldnt be a PH vehicle?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
wannabeeahack wrote:
is there any fundamental reason why a limo (and i refer to, say, a stretch yank, LHD,etc) shouldnt be a PH vehicle?

Three reasons, iffy drivers, iffy vehicles and iffy operators. :shock:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:53 pm
Posts: 108
Location: Brighton
grandad wrote:
In fact if I remember rightly, in January when the contract exemption came into force you thought that unlicenced limos would be taken off the road but that hasn't happened either has it?

A limo business in Brighton got fined and also lost a license from the traffic commissioner.

_________________
Unmet demand you're having a laugh


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:
grandad wrote:
In fact if I remember rightly, in January when the contract exemption came into force you thought that unlicenced limos would be taken off the road but that hasn't happened either has it?

So you must be the only person in the UK that thinks there are the same number of unlicensed stretch limos as before Jan this year. :shock:


No Not at all, there are a lot of operators that have actually got themselves licensed since January but there are still a hell of a lot out there that have just not bothered and they still operate. Last year I saw VOSA checks on limos most weekends from May to July. This year I saw none at all, although one of my mates did get inspected in Leicester. He was of course licensed, but through VOSA and not his LA.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Sussex wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
is there any fundamental reason why a limo (and i refer to, say, a stretch yank, LHD,etc) shouldnt be a PH vehicle?

Three reasons, iffy drivers, iffy vehicles and iffy operators. :shock:


ignoring the drivers+operators for a while

when you say "iffy vehicles" do you mean dodgy/damaged/etc or just the fact they are imported, or LHD or unusual seating arrangement?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
wannabeeahack wrote:
is there any fundamental reason why a limo (and i refer to, say, a stretch yank, LHD,etc) shouldnt be a PH vehicle?


Some councils simply refuse to license stretched limousines. Although I don't know of any operator who has lost an appeal to the courts on this matter. Of course the costs involved put most people off from trying. To start with you need to get your operators license which can be expensive in some areas. Then you have to buy your vehicle and get it inspected, most councils do not have the facilities to inspect, Then you send your application in and get it refused before you can go to court. If you lose then you have a limo that you can't use. The alternative is to operate under either PCV or restricted PCV. The restricted PCV route is ok provided the operation of the limousines is not your main job. Provided you keep to the rules then you have no problems going down this route and the driver does not even need a pcv license for 8 passenger vehicles and no medical or crb check.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
wannabeeahack wrote:
Sussex wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
is there any fundamental reason why a limo (and i refer to, say, a stretch yank, LHD,etc) shouldnt be a PH vehicle?

Three reasons, iffy drivers, iffy vehicles and iffy operators. :shock:


ignoring the drivers+operators for a while

when you say "iffy vehicles" do you mean dodgy/damaged/etc or just the fact they are imported, or LHD or unusual seating arrangement?


He means he doesn't like them.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
i think "8 in the back" is plenty, more is a bus


end of...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
wannabeeahack wrote:
when you say "iffy vehicles" do you mean dodgy/damaged/etc or just the fact they are imported, or LHD or unusual seating arrangement?

Vehicles not meeting the local council's required standards.

Also bench seating, and lack of escape routes, especially when you take into account how easy they burn. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
wannabeeahack wrote:
i think "8 in the back" is plenty, more is a bus


end of...


That is why over 8s require a pcv driver.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:32 pm
Posts: 552
Location: london/croydon
Sussex wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
is there any fundamental reason why a limo (and i refer to, say, a stretch yank, LHD,etc) shouldnt be a PH vehicle?

Three reasons, iffy drivers, iffy vehicles and iffy operators. :shock:



Thats not right...........
If a council DO license them , then there cant be any iffy drivers, iffy vehicles and iffy operators. as they would not grant any of the above a license.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 764 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group