Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 8:08 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 7:40 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
But I bet that view isn't shared by some, especially the thick in Hove. :shock:

LO lobbies for compulsory CCTV

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 837
Location: BRIGHTON & HOVE
I could not possibly comment :lol:

_________________
Mick Hildreth (07814 032002)
GMB PDB P39 Southern Region Branch Secretary
mick.hildreth@gmbtaxis.org.uk
www.gmbpdb.org.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
However, Mr Gray said some drivers have said they would be unwilling to fork out the £500 needed to fit the system in their cabs.


I think whilst some are unwilling to pay for it some will be unable to pay for it. If there are schemes available to help with payments that would be a start.

Quote:
A very sensible forward thinking licensing officer


This would appear to be a contradiction in terms

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:14 am
Posts: 312
toots wrote:
Quote:
However, Mr Gray said some drivers have said they would be unwilling to fork out the £500 needed to fit the system in their cabs.


I think whilst some are unwilling to pay for it some will be unable to pay for it. If there are schemes available to help with payments that would be a start.

Quote:
A very sensible forward thinking licensing officer


This would appear to be a contradiction in terms

When you see figures of between £200 and £500 mentioned for a cctv system you have to ask yourself is it worth it, especialy when the councils want to promote the expensive one, you wonder if they have an intrest in the company.

_________________
now a licensed hackney driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Wouldn't you have thought that this meeting of minds bunch would have come up with an application to the DfT to make CCTV optional at the discretion of taxi proprietors. Perhaps such a request is too sensible for the mindless bunch?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
JD wrote:
Wouldn't you have thought that this meeting of minds bunch would have come up with an application to the DfT to make CCTV optional at the discretion of taxi proprietors. Perhaps such a request is too sensible for the mindless bunch?

Regards

JD


What does the best practice and recent guidance state?

regards

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
JD wrote:
Wouldn't you have thought that this meeting of minds bunch would have come up with an application to the DfT to make CCTV optional at the discretion of taxi proprietors. Perhaps such a request is too sensible for the mindless bunch?

Regards

JD


What does the best practice and recent guidance state?

regards

CC


Best practice is in favour of CCTV but best practice isn't law and what we need is law because many councils couldn't give a chit about best practice.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 47
Location: LEEDS
toots wrote:
Quote:
However, Mr Gray said some drivers have said they would be unwilling to fork out the £500 needed to fit the system in their cabs.




I think whilst some are unwilling to pay for it some will be unable to pay for it. If there are schemes available to help with payments that would be a start.

Quote:
A very sensible forward thinking licensing officer


This would appear to be a contradiction in terms


tough luck, it's a fantastic idea, i'm sure their council will provide some sort of assisstance towards the cost, most do, and some are unable to pay?? oh the poor taxi driver bit, they could find the money, and anyeays, it'd all be offset via the taxman, so what's the problem??

_________________
best regards Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
marky v wrote:
toots wrote:
Quote:
However, Mr Gray said some drivers have said they would be unwilling to fork out the £500 needed to fit the system in their cabs.




I think whilst some are unwilling to pay for it some will be unable to pay for it. If there are schemes available to help with payments that would be a start.

Quote:
A very sensible forward thinking licensing officer


This would appear to be a contradiction in terms


tough luck, it's a fantastic idea, i'm sure their council will provide some sort of assisstance towards the cost, most do, and some are unable to pay?? oh the poor taxi driver bit, they could find the money, and anyeays, it'd all be offset via the taxman, so what's the problem??


Whilst it maybe tough luck and a fantastic idea IMO there will not be that many councils prepared to provide funding for the protection of taxi drivers. I believe some will provide funding for HC's who lets be honest already have some protection with the seperate compartment from the passenger but not the PH. With regards to playing the poor taxi driver bit not all taxi drivers are in areas that are busy and not all drivers earn enough to have money left over after they have paid their bills etc. Earnings are always at the mercy of your outgoings so it's not a matter of playing the 'poor taxi driver'. IMO it's a very assuming and ignorant attitude if you think all taxi drivers have nothing better to do with their money. I think it's going to be a balancing act to get this right with the needs of the taxi driver, the requirements of the council and the financing all round.

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 9:35 am 
I notice they've mentioned the NVQ scam.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Nigel wrote:
I notice they've mentioned the NVQ scam.


Why do you think it's a scam?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 4:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Hampshire (HC)
toots wrote:
Nigel wrote:
I notice they've mentioned the NVQ scam.


Why do you think it's a scam?


Ditto. Good question, Toots. =D>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:11 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
cabbyman wrote:
toots wrote:
Nigel wrote:
I notice they've mentioned the NVQ scam.


Why do you think it's a scam?


Ditto. Good question, Toots. =D>

I have bad vibes when ever anyone offers the taxi/PH trade something for nothing.

In fact it would be better if the gov gave all the money spent on free NVQs, to finance free CCTVs.

That would raise standards as there would be perfect evidence to rid iffy drivers from the trade, and of course help convict scum punters. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
its odd that a trade where "london" cabs can have a shield between driver and passengers, and the driver neednt wear a seatbelt simply due to the chances of being attacked is so half-hearted about a security CCTV being fitted....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Sussex wrote:
cabbyman wrote:
toots wrote:
Nigel wrote:
I notice they've mentioned the NVQ scam.


Why do you think it's a scam?


Ditto. Good question, Toots. =D>


In fact it would be better if the gov gave all the money spent on free NVQs, to finance free CCTVs.

That would raise standards as there would be perfect evidence to rid iffy drivers from the trade, and of course help convict scum punters. :wink:


How do you propose that the film be collected to rid iffy drivers from the trade. Do you perhaps think that drivers would hand in the footage for inspection every week. IMO it would be far better not to let iffy drivers into the trade in the first place. As I keep saying it is far too easy to become a taxi driver and I also believe that the NVQ does not go far enough.

Quote:
I have bad vibes when ever anyone offers the taxi/PH trade something for nothing.


Lets understand this correctly it is not something for nothing it is something that is being offered for a short period of time to current drivers to bring them up to the same standard as new drivers in so far as qualifications are concerned. The government understand that experience speaks volumes so they have allocated an amount of money to get the experienced qualified. IMO this funding will stop within a few years and then every taxi driver will have to pay it for themselves. Years of experience does not create good customer service some taxi drivers have a disgraceful attitude and should not be let within 10 feet of the public. On the whole the public are ok with taxi drivers it is a minority that spoils it and vice versa

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 728 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group