MR T wrote:
gusmac wrote:
MR T wrote:
JD wrote:
MR T wrote:
JD. firstly I said where I am... which is Sefton.... I know many Liverpool drivers paying £240 a week longer collar..... the initial question is to show that there has to be a balance
It is a good point but I think it will greatly assist Gusmac in his argument that vehicle rental in many restricted areas have an added element of cost simply because of quantity controls. That might not be the case in Sefton and possibly some other areas but I think if we all are all true to ourselves then most will probably agree that in many cases there is an added cost to vehicle rental in many areas simply because of the restriction factor.
Regards
JD
I think we can agree that prices are different in different areas... that is obvious and logical..... to some of us... it's a pity that other people cannot see past their nose. you know I have said that the only people allowed to drive Licence vehicles are licensed drivers, so why don't they have the balls to stand up for themselves.... and negotiate a realistic rental.
Because they know the owner would simply bin any driver who wasn't prepared to pay their asking price. There are always others who will.
Restricted plate supply and abundance of drivers gives the plate owners the advantage. I'm sure you knew that already.
So we come to the truth.... you haven't got the balls to stick together.....
This trade rarely ever sticks together for their own common good.
There are too many who will put their own short sighted interests first. A fact which your kind often use to your advantage.
This isn't a principled trade - your very existence is testement to that.
BTW Who's this "you" that you refer to? Certainly not me.
I'd leave this trade long before I ever give my hard earned wedge to a parasite like you.
Your kind are as important to this trade as crabs are to a dockside Lady of the Night.
An unpleasant occupational hazzard.