toots wrote:
MR T wrote:
I know that before I post this that it is a mistake
but what the heck! Will someone please tell me if I have got this the wrong way round.
1) Charlie was the secretary for region 5 NTA
2) Preston was a member, region 5 NTA
3) Charlie goes to Preston and holds a meeting
4) The meeting was not an official one because it was not called by the Associations committee
5) Charlie starts a new association with the same name as the original association and affiliates it to his own association.
Have I been dreaming or is this true?
6) Charlie's associations are sponsoring Charlie's bid to become the next independent MP for Bolton.
As concerning as it may appear you have the same dreams as me
Apart from that it would appear that you understand the situation fully
1) Right
2) Right
3) wrong Charley was asked to attend
4) wrong it was called by the committee of the PHCA, NOT ME
5) Wrong Charley ask to take the PHCA.
6) Wrong But as been asked to stand a s a councilor 18 months ago
1) Was Mr T there at the preston meeting No
2) was Mr Casey there at the meeting No
3) Was Selly there No
4) where Members of the PHAC yes and committe members yes
5) were is your proff i am wrong
6) so the PHCA members are also not right as well.
7) so the committee how signed the papers are wrong
The meeting on the 10th Janury 2008 was set up by our soliciors the meeting was overseen by our soliciors, the minutes were drawn up by the solicitors.
so an officer of the court as made it all this up have they. told lies put it in black and white, am i making the point yet.
and who was at the meeting the NTA Region 5 DIRECTOR. THank you and sat on the top table
Who was not there yes selly that right you whould think he would have been.
Who says its wrong
1) casey but he was not there
2) Mr T but he was not there
3) selly was not there
4) The good people on there but you were not there.
Well there you have it i was wrong all the time.
ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS TO GIVE HALF THE FUNDS TO PHCA NOT ME PHCA, we cant stop them calling themselfs what have called themselfs, but siad no. so as said if the FOS, SAYS IS BEST DEALT WITH BY THE COURTS THAT WERE IT WILL GO. AND FOR THE FULL AMOUNT.
Every chance as been given to them, i will know the ruleing of the fos with now 20 days. i will act on the ruleing.
_________________
C. Oakes
The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com
Login
Register
FAQ
