As elected Office Bearers Colky and Naeneck had a duty of care to act in the best interests of the company and that of its members. Instead the bold boys acted to protect and serve their own interests and misappropriated company funds to achieve exactly that aim. And by doing so they have brought the company into disrepute.
If anyone wants to check with Companies House you can confirm the gratuitous alienation of Colk's assets i.e. his Taxi and Plate through Mrs Naeneck? Then why not ask naeneck who's bank account was used for P191 credits to be paid into?
What substantial financial interest did Colky have in CRT? What did Colky have to lose as a Director of CRT? Who aided and abetted Colky in maintaining his position as Company Chairman?
Were Murray and Colky acting in the best interests of CRT or or were they looking after their own interests?
The Court Case?
The 12K Consultancy report?
The Incompetent Proposals?
The Incompetent Quorum?
All brushed under the table for the good of the company.
Really . . . .
