Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 12:06 am

Board index » General » Licensing and legal

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 14 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Doc G
 Post subject: genuine poser
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:17 am
Posts: 202
Location: Chichester
The following has just come up locally, I would be grateful for any comments.

The LGMP (1976) says:

(1) Except as authorised by this Part of this Act

(a) no person being the proprietor of any vehicle, not being a hackney carriage or London cab in respect of which a vehicle licence is in force, shall use or permit the same to be used in a controlled district as a private hire vehicle without having for such a vehicle a current licence under section 48 of this Act;
Scenario: Bob drives for AAAAA cars, a Private Hire Company. Bob is self employed, and does not own the car. Charlie holds the operator’s license for AAAAA cars; the vehicle is leased, to David, a director of AAAAA cars.

Q: Who is the proprietor of the car???

I cant answer it!
_____________________________________________________________
Top
 Profile  
 
cabbyman
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Hampshire (HC)
Forgive me if I try to clarify title to the vehicle:

Charlie is the 'company.'

David is the 'company' and the owner/licencee of the vehicle.

Bob is a licenced PH driver who 'works' for David.

Is that about right?

If so, the proprietor of the vehicle is David although similar conditions to those highlighted will probably apply to Bob's PH driver's licence.
Top
 Profile  
 
MR T
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
The owner of the vehicle or the company that owns the vehicle is the proprietor. :wink:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!
Top
 Profile  
 
tx_op
 Post subject: Re: genuine poser
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:22 am 
Doc G wrote:
The following has just come up locally, I would be grateful for any comments.

The LGMP (1976) says:

(1) Except as authorised by this Part of this Act

(a) no person being the proprietor of any vehicle, not being a hackney carriage or London cab in respect of which a vehicle licence is in force, shall use or permit the same to be used in a controlled district as a private hire vehicle without having for such a vehicle a current licence under section 48 of this Act;

Scenario: Bob drives for AAAAA cars, a Private Hire Company. Bob is self employed, and does not own the car. Charlie holds the operator’s license for AAAAA cars; the vehicle is leased, to David, a director of AAAAA cars.

Q: Who is the proprietor of the car???

I cant answer it!

Easy...

So if Bob has got to make
half of his and Charlie's take
it's obvious that David is a sponging fake
for feck's sake !!!
_____________________________________________________________
Top
  
 
Sussex
 Post subject: Re: genuine poser
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
Doc G wrote:
Q: Who is the proprietor of the car???

As they all said above the proprietor is the owner of the vehicle.

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
Doc G
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:17 am
Posts: 202
Location: Chichester
Quote:
Charlie is the 'company.'
- not certain

Quote:
David is the 'company' and the owner/licensee of the vehicle.
True - He has his name on the lease of the car, but although a director, he does not front the company, let’s say he has a quarter share of the company.

Quote:
Bob is a licensed PH driver who 'works' for David.
- Correct

Charlie, is also not the owner, he is another director, another dimension to add is “Fred”, the majority shareholder.

Like you guys I am inclined to think it may be the person who’s name is on the lease of the car, but that presumably means that the “Big Boss”, is not culpable?
Top
 Profile  
 
Fae Fife
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:31 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Guess?
Doc G wrote:
Like you guys I am inclined to think it may be the person who’s name is on the lease of the car, but that presumably means that the “Big Boss”, is not culpable?


Can't really see what the problem is here - the proprietor of the vehicle for the purposes of having a licence for it seems quite clear cut.

Whether the company as the holder of the operator's licence may bear some responsibility for the vehicles under its umbrella is a different issue - and a further issue still is to what extent individual shareholders of the company are culpable - but for the purposes of the section you quote the issue doesn't seem problematic.
Top
 Profile  
 
Doc G
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:17 am
Posts: 202
Location: Chichester
Very obliged to you all for your comments, gentlemen
Top
 Profile  
 
cabbyman
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Hampshire (HC)
Care to hint at why we've commented?
Top
 Profile  
 
MR T
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
cabbyman wrote:
Care to hint at why we've commented?

because we are all smart arses.... that think we know what we are talking about. :lol:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!
Top
 Profile  
 
Doc G
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:17 am
Posts: 202
Location: Chichester
Cabbyman said:
Quote:
Care to hint at why we've commented?


A few local PHV caught plying (allegedly of course!) in test purchases by people organised by local Hack drivers.

PHV drivers can’t be identified because of the Freedom of Information Act privacy, and the Council won’t give details.

District judge said go for the proprietor then – so now the question is, who goes to court??

Simples!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
tx_op
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:43 am 
The Judge, the defence, the prosecution, any witnesses and anyone who wishes to sit in the public gallery !!! :twisted:
Top
  
 
cabbyman
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Hampshire (HC)
But, didn't the 'passengers' either note the badge details of the driver, which must of course be on display at all times while on duty, or ask for his ID at the end of the journey?

IMHO, that is the crucial piece of evidence if you are preparing a case. After all, with respect, it's not the vehicle or the proprietor that plies for hire, it's the driver.
Top
 Profile  
 
Doc G
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 11:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:17 am
Posts: 202
Location: Chichester
The “test purchasers” were all instructed to look and note down details on personal ID badges

Guess what ? - Not one of them had a badge on display, either on them or inside the vehicles.

Even if you were able to identify them by name you cannot get their address from the Council (FOI restrictions again).

DVLA usually comes up blank as well, because the majority were working for a firm and did not own the vehicle they were driving.

Makes you wonder when no insurance is a level 4 criminal activity, and all manage to hide. eusasmiles.zip
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 14 posts ] 

Board index » General » Licensing and legal

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 185 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group