Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 12:52 am

Board index » General » Licensing and legal

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
solo.cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 46
Location: Telford
Well granddad, you and I are both old enough to realize that we will always argue our corners, but in reality we can never be 100% certain in owt to do with Councils and our Trades understanding of these Acts of Parliament, I really doubt if anybody can.

Mal
Top
 Profile  
 
grandad
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
solo.cab wrote:
Well granddad, you and I are both old enough to realize that we will always argue our corners, but in reality we can never be 100% certain in owt to do with Councils and our Trades understanding of these Acts of Parliament, I really doubt if anybody can.

Mal


On this one I am certain that I am 100% right.

_________________
Grandad,
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
solo.cab wrote:
1847 Act has not been repealed or to my idea of thinking not been superseded by 1976 LGMPA ,so still applies, but like I say these Acts are like knitting fog but more complex.

Councils that chose to adopt the 1976 act (all bar London and Plymouth) have thus adopted the fares procedure contained within it. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
gusmac wrote:
solo.cab wrote:
for the payment of more than the fare allowed by any byelaw made under this or
the special Act, shall be binding on the person making the same;


Which authority makes byelaws which apply beyond it's boundaries?


Some LA's have local acts....whereby and for example the prescribed area is a set distance from a certain point in the borough....the Greater Manchester Act 1981 springs immediately to mind.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
charles007
 Post subject: yes but
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
Biy laws should not be used to replace primary legistartion are am i told of the make.

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com
Top
 Profile  
 
grandad
 Post subject: Re: yes but
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
charles007 wrote:
Biy laws should not be used to replace primary legistartion are am i told of the make.


Translation please?

_________________
Grandad,
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject: Re: yes but
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
charles007 wrote:
Biy laws should not be used to replace primary legistartion are am i told of the make.

They can't, and they don't.

By-laws have to be approved by the government, so I can't see them approving a by-law which goes against existing statute law.

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
Chris the Fish
 Post subject: Re: yes but
PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
grandad wrote:
charles007 wrote:
Biy laws should not be used to replace primary legistartion are am i told of the make.


Translation please?


I think he means "Bye Laws should not be used to replace primary legislation, or am I totally off the mark."


But, to be honest, I could be totally off the mark myself.

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related
Top
 Profile  
 
Chilon of Sparta
 Post subject: Re: yes but
PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:56 pm
Posts: 201
Chris the Fish wrote:
grandad wrote:
charles007 wrote:
Biy laws should not be used to replace primary legistartion are am i told of the make.


Translation please?


I think he means "Bye Laws should not be used to replace primary legislation, or am I totally off the mark."


But, to be honest, I could be totally off the mark myself.


Nice work sir. Chris the Fish...AKA...the "human enigma machine". :lol:
Top
 Profile  
 
solo.cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 46
Location: Telford
sorry charles dont understand your post
Mal
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
solo.cab wrote:
sorry charles dont understand your post

Join this; :roll:

Image

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » General » Licensing and legal

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 172 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group