Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 8:19 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Blind man snubbed by Brighton taxi driver - due to "fear of dogs"
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/4832722. ... _of_dogs_/


A taxi driver refused to take a blind man and his guide dog to the Labour Party conference in Brighton because he is afraid of dogs.

What he did not know was that John Dickinson-Lilley is a parliamentary officer for the Royal National Institute for the Blind Mr Dickinson-Lilley was at the conference to lobby ministers and MPs for improved rights for the blind and partially sighted.

He arrived at Brighton station on the first day of the conference at the Brighton Centre on September 27.

Station staff showed him and his black Labrador guide dog Jimmy to the taxi rank where he queued with MPs and a Secretary of State.

But Mohammad Babak refused to let them into the Brighton and Hove Streamline taxi he was driving.

Mr Dickinson-Lilley, from Norwich, said: “The driver said 'no, no dogs'.

“I explained that he was a guide dog – Jimmy was in his harness – and that he was obliged to carry me and the dog.

“The driver said he did not carry dogs, including guide dogs and that the cab was not his anyway.”

Station staff also appealed to Babak but their pleas fell on deaf ears.

Mr Dickinson-Lilley said: “I felt completely humiliated and embarrassed.

“I am a Parliamentary Officer and had been embarrassed infront of senior MPs who I might have to work with."

Babak, 25, of Carden Hill, Brighton, admitted failing to comply with his duty to carry Mr Dickinson-Lilley and Jimmy when he appeared at Brighton Magistrates’ Court yesterday.

Lucinda Dore, defending, said Babak had medical evidence to back his claims that he is allergic to dogs and is frightened of them.

She added: “That apart he wants to apologise for the distress that this caused to the victim of this offence."

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
“I am a Parliamentary Officer and had been embarrassed infront of senior MPs who I might have to work with."

I am reliably informed that in the queue at the rank was a couple of MPs and a Secretary of State.

Now bearing in mind that it was Labour Party Conference week, that driver must be the thickest ***t ever to have driven a cab. [-(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
captain cab wrote:


Lucinda Dore, defending, said Babak had medical evidence to back his claims that he is allergic to dogs and is frightened of them.

"


Strange that at the time the driver didn't mention this allergy or show his evidence. :wink:

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
I have just had an idea :shock:
Before johnny ma hat ma coat foreigner gets his licence he should be made to cuddle a pit bull :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:32 pm
Posts: 400
What was his sentence for this offence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 431
I understand anybody not wanting to take dogs, especially in a saloon car, but I have to agree with Sussex. This driver has to be the thickest ***t ever, never mind the labour conference, he is on the station rank in front of station staff, it was bound to be reported.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
jon wrote:
What was his sentence for this offence.

£67.50 fine.
£15.00 victim surcharge.
£200.00 costs.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:39 am
Posts: 246
Guide dogs are better behaved than most of my passengers.

_________________
Wishing I was in Greenhall Whitley Land.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Sussex wrote:
jon wrote:
What was his sentence for this offence.

£67.50 fine.
£15.00 victim surcharge.
£200.00 costs.


And lost licence for beaching the disability act if the council has any sense


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
skippy41 wrote:
And lost licence for beaching the disability act if the council has any sense

Not for a one off offence.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 698 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group