Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Apr 22, 2026 5:10 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
ALI T wrote:
its even worse than that gusmac
as they have allowed ipl applicants to apply(they did so in the form of a company) they were told they are not allowed to then given all there money back and allowed to apply again,and then put in front of applicants who were before them twice :lol: :lol: :lol:

this is corruption! full stop.


It certainly seems that someone is hell bent on giving preference to the IPL, despite it having no legal standing. This alone will be grounds for appeal should CEC choose this route.

CEC can't legally refuse to accept company applications, so I'm assuming the IPL applicants are being allowed to re-apply as individuals since that is how they were recorded on the IPL? An application in the name of a company would be treated the same as any other application not on the IPL. Individual applicants will be unable to sell their plate though. :wink:
The new application should have bumped them down the order of any list - not that it actually matters since each application has to be determined on it's own merits.
CEC are having a laugh FFS. They are going to do what they want and see who has the balls to appeal and who will meekly accept 90% of their money back.

ALI T wrote:
but it seems no one is doing anything to stop them,so they will get away with it.


I dare say there will be a few unhappy bunnies afterwards who may then decide to appeal to the courts.
If it were me, I'd be talking to my brief now about an injunction to stop any illegal allocations.
If the IPL get their plates allocated in this way, nobody can take them back later.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:03 pm
Posts: 2
First post so apologies for any forum slip ups.

My application was in and accepted prior to the meeting 28th Aug and I have no intention of standing back and accepting the Councils ready made decision to reject the application.

I would appreciate if possible some advice as to how I might proceed.

Could anyone (ALI T ?) perhaps advise on costs/procedures re appeal to Sheriff, whether its advisable and or possible to do it yourself without a solicitor.

The name of a good solicitor if required.

My thanks in advance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
You could go it alone without a solicitor but it's not advisable.
Get together with the other refused applicants and share the costs.
If you win, the council will be paying anyway.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57319
Location: 1066 Country
Gavin wrote:
I would appreciate if possible some advice as to how I might proceed.

Could anyone (ALI T ?) perhaps advise on costs/procedures re appeal to Sheriff, whether its advisable and or possible to do it yourself without a solicitor.

The name of a good solicitor if required.

My thanks in advance.

Why not PM your phone number to Ali T, and ask him to ring you?

Also you could contact Mr Skull and Mr Taylor, and see if you can join up with them.

It would be unwise if it ended up with umpteen different solicitors fighting this battle, and I would recommend a group challenge.

Although I realise that's easier said than done. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
Gus is right ,get together with some of the others and fight it speak to Thomson or tatty looks like they are already geared up for it.

you don't really need a solicitor it can be done by yourselves but it ain't easy,besides i don't see anything to complicated here.
but if your not sure employ a solicitor(not Mrs f munday whatever you do) i cant see this one going much beyond a first calling if done correctly.lets face it, its downright discrimination.

Ive always found the civil department in the sheriff court very helpful
ill try and help as much as i can but i cant commit to much time at the moment,ill try and put something together for you over the next week
if i have time,it wont be perfect but it should get the ball rolling,but your best bet is with Thomson at the mo,as I'm sure they have been planning this for a while :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:03 pm
Posts: 2
Many thanks for the advice and thanks also to ALI T for the
offer.

I appreciate the time factor and will fully understand if it is not possible
to draft up something.

I do realise that it might be cost effective if we all stood under the same banner but experience has taught me that,
one taxi driver is good company, two are a good laugh, three are an arguement and four are a fight !

I would prefer if possible to fight my own battles and win lose or draw at least its down to me.

I agree though that success will be better achieved if all refused applicants stood together,
shared costs and information and sang the same song.

Question is, can they ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57319
Location: 1066 Country
Gavin wrote:
I would prefer if possible to fight my own battles and win lose or draw at least its down to me.

Nothing wrong with that, but I suspect others will have loads of relevant info which can only be of use if you go your own way. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 110
IPL granted 27 licences all live applications refused. As I had said before CEC had made their mind up before the meeting and was just going through the motions of all applications to be individually considered. The meeting was a farce from start to finish. CEC practically admitted that the IPL had no legal standing but have decided to go with the IPL anyway. Blatant discrimination and incompetency, it is now going through the courts...

_________________
LET THE TRUTH BE TOLD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57319
Location: 1066 Country
Jinky wrote:
it is now going through the courts...

And maybe de-limitation. If so those gutless councillors can then say that they tried their best. :^o

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:26 pm
Posts: 850
Location: jock HQ
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh dear 8) 8) 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
[quote="Jinky"]IPL granted 27 licences all live applications refused. [quote]

I believe that this was my prediction at the outset.
I further predict that no one will else will get a plate, even through the courts.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:26 pm
Posts: 850
Location: jock HQ
grandad wrote:
Jinky wrote:
IPL granted 27 licences all live applications refused.
Quote:

I believe that this was my prediction at the outset.
I further predict that no one will else will get a plate, even through the courts.


think you could be right grandad and also the cap stays on

before everyone jumps in with the usual tosh the market like every where else in the uk cant handle a increase in taxis on the road for some time yet so whats the point in killing what little trade there is out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
isn't this a bit of a non event :shock:

it was said by many that this was the route the council would take,
indeed the council said themselves that this was there preferred route for some time,i cant really see why anyone even bothered going up there,it was always going to be settled in court,you've gotta laugh at the fasties lot thinking they have some sort of victory,i don't think! :lol:
when this hits the courts its all over IMO


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
grandad wrote:
Jinky wrote:
IPL granted 27 licences all live applications refused.
Quote:

I believe that this was my prediction at the outset.
I further predict that no one will else will get a plate, even through the courts.

does that prediction have any foundation,or are we in the realms of clairvoyancy :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:26 pm
Posts: 850
Location: jock HQ
the cap will stay on no matter what happens in court thats it in a nut shell ALI


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 844 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group