Sussex wrote:
But they could not agree among themselves on a rise in fare charges, so councillors threw out any plans for a raise until rival trade bodies could decide on a figure.
I have always found that councillors will refuse a fare increase if the trade is not united in what they are asking for.
Otherwise it smacks of favouritism by councillors towards one representative body & they don't like being put into that kind of position.
On many occasions in years gone by in Brum when the trade has not been able to agree on the level of fare increase to go for, I have asked a cab driver colleague to put in an application (as a stalking horse) for a Variation in The Hackney Carriage Table of Fares, which is so high that it is bound to be thrown out by councillors.
The rest of the trade representative bodies are then galvanised into action & eventual agreement, purely because they fear that should the initial 'stalking horse' application for a huge fare rise be unexpectedly passed by the Licensing Committee, it would be detrimental to trade by its severity.
Then, once the trade submit a unified fare increase application, my colleague either withdraws his 'stalking horse' application in writing before the Licensing Committee meeting to decide the matter, or on one occasion in the past when agreement by trade representative bodies was 'luke-warm', he actually came to the meeting & withdrew his 'stalking horse' application during the meeting in favour of the unified trade application & voiced his support for the unified trade representative bodies joint application.
And that's the way we 'force' (for want of a better word) a fare application to be a unified one in Brum.