Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 12:59 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
wannabeeahack wrote:
grandad wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
is the carrying of helper dogs a DisDis issue or LA matter?

ive not got our LAs "executive" R&R's/twaddle but if i ran a Bentley Continetal turbo i very much doubt any shaggy dog would be getting on my axminster carpets...


I would guess that the Bentley would be PH and not Hackney.


"Speciality" plated here


That is still Private Hire.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
wannabeeahack wrote:
Dogs are livestock, im not a farmer...or vet


No they are not.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
grandad wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
Dogs are livestock, im not a farmer...or vet


No they are not.


if it walks on all fours its welcome to trot home...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:04 pm
Posts: 2859
Location: SCOTLAND
Still not learning

A MINICAB firm has been accused of refusing to take a deaf and visually impaired passenger because she had a guide dog.

Mother-of-two Lorna Patton contacted Jasons Cars in Sayes Court Road, Orpington, to book a cab for her disabled son’s information and outreach worker, who works for deafblind charity Sense.

Emma Boswell was visiting Ms Patton’s 19-year-old son Max for a three-hour appointment to prepare for his future needs, by filling in applications to get him a guide dog as well as a white walking stick.

Max and Mrs Boswell both have Usher syndrome, which means they are deaf and have deterioating vision.

When Ms Patton called for a minicab, she claims the firm said it did not take guide dogs.

Ms Patton, 41, said: “The law states you can’t refuse a person with a guide dog.

“I was fuming, absolutely disgusted. This could be my son in future, stranded with a guide dog. As cab companies they should be aware of the law.”

Ms Patton, from Orpington, has made an official complaint to Transport for London’s public carriage office, claiming the minicab firm breached section 37a of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA).

The legislation states drivers of licensed taxis and private hire vehicles have a duty to carry, without additional cost, any guide dog, or any other registered assistance dog, travelling with a disabled person.

Mrs Boswell said: “It can be frustrating for guide dog owners when companies such as taxi drivers or restaurants turn us away because there is a lack of understanding or awareness about the Disability Discrimination Act.

“The DDA law was introduced in 1985 and it states they have a duty not to treat a disabled person less favourably within any services they provide, which includes transport.

“They are not allowed to refuse my guide dog.”

The director of Sense, Sandra Osborne, said: “This incident must have been really upsetting for Emma, Lorna and Max.

“It is illegal for a cab driver to refuse entry to a guide dog. Unfortunately this type of incident is still all too common.

“It shows that we still have a long way to go to eradicate discrimination against people with a disability.

“Guide dogs are not pets. They are the eyes and ears of people with dual sensory loss.”

Managing director of the minicab firm Richard Harley said: “We were more than helpful to the lady and we weren’t rude.

“We didn’t have a car at that moment in time.

“Our drivers are self-employed, some take dogs and the one car we were able to offer was from someone who did not take a dog.

“They are not obliged to take anybody.

“We did not refuse to take her or the impaired person.

“This particular driver did not take dogs.”

A TfL spokeswoman said: TfL spokesperson said: “We are currently looking into the complaint logged by Ms Patton on Thursday June 10.

"A member of our complaints team will contact Ms Patton shortly.”

http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/news ... passenger/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
stationtone wrote:
Still not learning

A MINICAB firm has been accused of refusing to take a deaf and visually impaired passenger because she had a guide dog.

Mother-of-two Lorna Patton contacted Jasons Cars in Sayes Court Road, Orpington, to book a cab for her disabled son’s information and outreach worker, who works for deafblind charity Sense.

Emma Boswell was visiting Ms Patton’s 19-year-old son Max for a three-hour appointment to prepare for his future needs, by filling in applications to get him a guide dog as well as a white walking stick.

Max and Mrs Boswell both have Usher syndrome, which means they are deaf and have deterioating vision.

When Ms Patton called for a minicab, she claims the firm said it did not take guide dogs.

Ms Patton, 41, said: “The law states you can’t refuse a person with a guide dog.

“I was fuming, absolutely disgusted. This could be my son in future, stranded with a guide dog. As cab companies they should be aware of the law.”

Ms Patton, from Orpington, has made an official complaint to Transport for London’s public carriage office, claiming the minicab firm breached section 37a of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA).

The legislation states drivers of licensed taxis and private hire vehicles have a duty to carry, without additional cost, any guide dog, or any other registered assistance dog, travelling with a disabled person.

Mrs Boswell said: “It can be frustrating for guide dog owners when companies such as taxi drivers or restaurants turn us away because there is a lack of understanding or awareness about the Disability Discrimination Act.

“The DDA law was introduced in 1985 and it states they have a duty not to treat a disabled person less favourably within any services they provide, which includes transport.

“They are not allowed to refuse my guide dog.”

The director of Sense, Sandra Osborne, said: “This incident must have been really upsetting for Emma, Lorna and Max.

“It is illegal for a cab driver to refuse entry to a guide dog. Unfortunately this type of incident is still all too common.

“It shows that we still have a long way to go to eradicate discrimination against people with a disability.

“Guide dogs are not pets. They are the eyes and ears of people with dual sensory loss.”

Managing director of the minicab firm Richard Harley said: “We were more than helpful to the lady and we weren’t rude.

“We didn’t have a car at that moment in time.

“Our drivers are self-employed, some take dogs and the one car we were able to offer was from someone who did not take a dog.

“They are not obliged to take anybody.

“We did not refuse to take her or the impaired person.

“This particular driver did not take dogs.”

A TfL spokeswoman said: TfL spokesperson said: “We are currently looking into the complaint logged by Ms Patton on Thursday June 10.

"A member of our complaints team will contact Ms Patton shortly.”

http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/news ... passenger/


If they really Objected to taking taking dogs of any description and knew she had a dog then they'ed have been brighter to just have said they had no Vehicle available without digging a great big hole to bury themselves in a like..well..like a dog burying a Bone!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
whoops....sticky Keyboard!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
bloodnock wrote:
whoops....sticky Keyboard!!!


Well stop drinking by it and it would't get sticky and give it a clean ffs :lol: :lol:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
toots wrote:
bloodnock wrote:
whoops....sticky Keyboard!!!


Well stop drinking by it and it would't get sticky and give it a clean ffs :lol: :lol:


Its nowt to do wi the drink.... :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
bloodnock wrote:
toots wrote:
bloodnock wrote:
whoops....sticky Keyboard!!!


Well stop drinking by it and it would't get sticky and give it a clean ffs :lol: :lol:


Its nowt to do wi the drink.... :?


I said drink cos the other alternative was disturbing :shock: :lol: :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
toots wrote:
bloodnock wrote:
toots wrote:
bloodnock wrote:
whoops....sticky Keyboard!!!


Well stop drinking by it and it would't get sticky and give it a clean ffs :lol: :lol:


Its nowt to do wi the drink.... :?


I said drink cos the other alternative was disturbing :shock: :lol: :wink:


I beg your pardon!!!......the Stickiness is from my Blackcurrant Jam sandwiches :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Quote:
“The DDA law was introduced in 1985 and it states they have a duty not to treat a disabled person less favourably within any services they provide, which includes transport. "


sorted

NO DOGS AT ALL

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
bloodnock wrote:
If they really Objected to taking taking dogs of any description and knew she had a dog then they'ed have been brighter to just have said they had no Vehicle available without digging a great big hole to bury themselves in a like..well..like a dog burying a Bone!!

Because the person giving the information is no doubt being paid £2 an hour and doesn't give a monkeys.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
maybe it was ordered by text..... :sad:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 718 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group