Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 9:12 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
Smoked Glass wrote:
Yes of course, but I still maintain he is not operating vehicles.


So what does a PH operator's licence entail?

Surely it's taking bookings, which are then passed on to private hire vehicles, which the operator may or may not own.

A private hire office may have hundreds of vehicles, none of which are owned by the operator who is taking the bookings. A driver who is also the vehicle proprietor but has nothing to do with the office other than paying it a rent doesn't need an operator's licence, surely?

So what's the difference between that and the scenario outlined at the start of the thread?

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
Smoked Glass wrote:
[You are trying to pigeon hole taxirouter as an OPERATOR. He is not an operator of vehicles, merely a third party facilitator or go between. The same can be said of a travel agent.
REF:Your local travel agent does not need one when they book Mr & Mrs Smith a coach to take them to Blackpool. The Coach Company does though because they are the ones who are operating passenger vehicles. They are the ones who have to make sure their coaches are roadworthy and fully insured. They are the ones who are Liable .


Well you're talking about two different licencing systems, but a PH operator is someone taking bookings, which are then passed on to licenced PH cars and drivers, so why shouldn't taxirouter be pigeonholed as a PH operator?

What's the difference between taxirouter and a standard PH booking office?

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
Smoked Glass wrote:
[You are trying to pigeon hole taxirouter as an OPERATOR. He is not an operator of vehicles, merely a third party facilitator or go between. The same can be said of a travel agent.
REF:Your local travel agent does not need one when they book Mr & Mrs Smith a coach to take them to Blackpool. The Coach Company does though because they are the ones who are operating passenger vehicles. They are the ones who have to make sure their coaches are roadworthy and fully insured. They are the ones who are Liable .


Well you're talking about two different licencing systems, but a PH operator is someone taking bookings, which are then passed on to licenced PH cars and drivers, so why shouldn't taxirouter be pigeonholed as a PH operator?

What's the difference between taxirouter and a standard PH booking office?


The same difference I would think, if I've understood this right, as between Cabfind and a PH booking office. Having said that I could be entirely wrong :lol:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
toots wrote:
The same difference I would think, if I've understood this right, as between Cabfind and a PH booking office. Having said that I could be entirely wrong :lol:


So what's the difference between Cabfind and a PH booking office, Toots, because I'm afraid I've forgotten, even assuming I ever knew in the first place :?

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
toots wrote:
The same difference I would think, if I've understood this right, as between Cabfind and a PH booking office. Having said that I could be entirely wrong :lol:


So what's the difference between Cabfind and a PH booking office, Toots, because I'm afraid I've forgotten, even assuming I ever knew in the first place :?


cabfinder is just a source for a cab surely, no different to yell.com, but nore like findataxi, 118me, cabquoter, etc, etc...

i set one up purely as a trial - see my www below


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
wannabeeahack wrote:
cabfinder is just a source for a cab surely, no different to yell.com, but nore like findataxi, 118me, cabquoter, etc, etc...

i set one up purely as a trial - see my www below


Yell.com is just an online phone book, and some of the others are similar directory-style sites, but if the site is taking bookings from customers and getting PH cars to to the work then that's different, and an op's licence is required?

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:04 pm
Posts: 36
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Thanks for the replies...

I am still of the mind that i don't need a OPS license and the main reason I feel this way is that i WILL NOT be the person taking bookings. I don't have any cars and i dont employ any taxi drivers.

Bookings will still be made in the normal way, between the customer and the taxi.

_________________
www.taxiroute.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
taxiroute wrote:
Thanks for the replies...

I am still of the mind that i don't need a OPS license and the main reason I feel this way is that i WILL NOT be the person taking bookings. I don't have any cars and i dont employ any taxi drivers.

Bookings will still be made in the normal way, between the customer and the taxi.


your quite right, you are a refferal servive, not a booking agent


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
cabfinder is just a source for a cab surely, no different to yell.com, but nore like findataxi, 118me, cabquoter, etc, etc...

i set one up purely as a trial - see my www below


Yell.com is just an online phone book, and some of the others are similar directory-style sites, but if the site is taking bookings from customers and getting PH cars to to the work then that's different, and an op's licence is required?


hes not taking bookins though is he


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
the first of these lives in spain....ops licence? i dont think so



http://www.taxiclub.co.uk/

http://www.taxiquoter.co.uk/

http://www.quotemetaxi.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
toots wrote:
The same difference I would think, if I've understood this right, as between Cabfind and a PH booking office. Having said that I could be entirely wrong :lol:


So what's the difference between Cabfind and a PH booking office, Toots, because I'm afraid I've forgotten, even assuming I ever knew in the first place :?


Personally I don't think there is a difference, but, apparently there is when it comes to licensing. It's run similar to the doomed Fraser Eagle as far as I can make out :-|

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
taxiroute wrote:
Bookings will still be made in the normal way, between the customer and the taxi.

But are you making provisions for the acceptance of bookings? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
is it any different to skyscanner and the actual airlines it quotes off?

skyscanner would need to be ABTA bonded if cabquoter needed an ops licence

course they dont need an ops licence


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
taxiroute wrote:
I am still of the mind that i don't need a OPS license and the main reason I feel this way is that i WILL NOT be the person taking bookings. I don't have any cars and i dont employ any taxi drivers.


But many PH set ups don't own the cars or employ the drivers. They take bookings and pass them on to drivers. But the business taking the bookings and passing them on must have an operator's licence.



Quote:
Bookings will still be made in the normal way, between the customer and the taxi


Well for a start it should be recalled that there's no operator's licence needed to pass work to taxis/Hackney carriages, so that's an irrelevance.

However, if it's a PH car that's getting the work then there must be an operator's licence in play somewhere, and all three licences - operator, vehicle proprietor and driver - must be from the same LA.

Section 80 of the legislation says:

"operate" means in the course of business to make provision for the invitation or acceptance of bookings for a private hire vehicle;

And to pass such work to PH vehicles you must have an operator's licence.

Perhaps the answer to the national booking office question is that if you pass on work to a licenced operator then you don't need a licence because you're not operating PH vehicles - the person with the operator's licence is doing that.

Thus perhaps the answer is that you can pass on work without a licence provided it's to someone who actually has a PH operator's licence.

You can't pass on work to a PH car and driver who doesn't have an operator's licence.

There must be an licenced operator involved somewhere in the chain.

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:23 am
Posts: 624
Location: North Wales
wannabeeahack wrote:
taxiroute wrote:
Thanks for the replies...

I am still of the mind that i don't need a OPS license and the main reason I feel this way is that i WILL NOT be the person taking bookings. I don't have any cars and i dont employ any taxi drivers.

Bookings will still be made in the normal way, between the customer and the taxi.


your quite right, you are a refferal servive, not a booking agent
I agree.
I think we would all agree if a customer went from A to B using this service somewhere along the way the customer should be in a licensed vehicle taxi or private hire.
I would stop trying to work the problem out from the customers first point of contact and try to look at it from the PH drivers viewpoint in reverse to make it easier to dissect. [The taxi part will legally look after itself[.

The PH driver accepts a job off the radio, the PH company accepted the job off a PDA or Mobile, the taxirouter accepted the job off the customer.
Only one operators license is required, the one that gives out the work to the Drivers/Vehicles that they control. Again if you have no vehicles that you control/own/run/operate you do not require an ops license
The PH Licensed car should be used under an operators License. My point is as long as this is in place why do you need the third party referral company to have to have one too.
The Captain posted this and it clearly states 56 Operators of private hire vehicles..

(1)For the purposes of this Part of this Act every contract for the hire of a private hire vehicle licensed under this Part of this Act shall be deemed to be made with the operator who accepted the booking for that vehicle whether or not he himself provided the vehicle..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 247 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group