Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm Posts: 37494 Location: Wayneistan
|
Council should foot bill for cost of resprays
I T was interesting to read the various comments in the letters pages of Friday's Evening Post regarding the Bristol taxi drivers issue with Bristol City Council concerning the respraying of their taxis to conform to the new policy introduced in May 2008.
The one thing that struck me was how many people are prepared to pass comment when clearly they know absolutely nothing about the subject matter.
One comment in particular really made my blood boil, "over-inflated prices", and apparently, we all want to earn £20 for 15 minutes work. Do you have any idea what it costs to keep a taxi on the road? Clearly not!
Depending on vehicle type operated, the cost per mile to operate that vehicle, excluding wages, is around £1.20. Bristol's current day-time tariff is around £1.70 per mile, plus initial start fare of £2.50. The average journey (based on BCC calculations) is three miles, so – fare around £7.60 minus running costs, the driver earns just £4. With the average working practice of one job per hour outside rush hours, that driver is actually earning less than the national minimum wage for much of the day.
Although the operating costs of a taxi is rising year on year, fuel by 24 per cent, insurance by approximately 20 per cent, licences, tests etc, our fares have not increased for two years. The council has decided to sit on our annual cost of living fare rise request for nearly eight months despite the fact we desperately need that rise and which only represents just 3 per cent per year over the past two years.
Whether or not you agree with a uniform colour fleet policy and the other changes to operating conditions for taxi operators is neither here nor there, but the facts still remain, under this new policy, taxi operators are required to respray all the existing fleet with a non-standard, not available through any vehicle manufacturer, shade of blue. Despite the council's own fictitious estimates costing much less than our quotations, a proper respray will cost around £1,500 plus two weeks loss of earnings while the work is done. Then operators will be restricted to what advertising can be displayed. All-over body wraps will no longer be permitted, nothing on the bonnet, roof or boot and nothing above the lower window line. This restriction could potentially lose an operator up to £2,000 per year.
We potentially lose up to £6,000 in a year so Bristol City Council gets a "pretty" looking taxi fleet. Is that fair? We own the taxis, not the council. If they want them resprayed – let them pay for it. And remember, it's your money they will be using to defend this legal action.
Martyn Lawrence, (former taxi trade representative).
I SEE Bristol City Council are at it again. My word, this time it's the colour of taxis. Can't help thinking that if this current council would have been around in Brunel's day, wow, no suspension bridge, no Temple Meads and, of course, much more. Just a thought.
Phil Hewitt, Brentry.
IT was a better than expected response to our plight concerning the colour change to Bristol taxis; our grateful thanks to the Evening Post and Radio Bristol for their coverage.
It is abundantly clear that the vast majority of the people of Bristol agree with us that, the "new" colour policy for Bristol's taxis as introduced by Bristol City Council is nothing short of madness.
The council has chosen a shade of blue that no vehicle manufacturer can supply from stock, therefore, if any of our trade members decides to buy a brand new £30,000 vehicle, it still has to be resprayed.
To look at the wider picture, we in the taxi trade have faced up to 30 per cent increases in fuel bills, 20 per cent increase in insurance costs, and bear in mind we are not insuring a standard car. Our average insurance costs are well over £1,000 per year.
In addition, we are competing with night buses, originally six routes covered, now 14, and of course there is the work we lose to the illegal taxis and private hire, which work our city with a completely free hand due to a very serious lack of enforcement by this very same council. Throw into the equation the recession, the taxi trade being in a deregulated state (over 80 new multi-seater taxis have joined the fleet since this barmy policy was introduced), and vehicle licenses are still being issued like confetti, nor have we even had a cost of living fare rise for two years (another lie and broken promise from our council).
Can anyone give me a good reason as to why I should now spend another £1,500 on painting my taxi, and why I should accept potentially losing up to a further £2,000 a year through lost advertising revenue just to give this council a "pretty" looking taxi fleet?
Where does this council think the money comes from?
From just one of 850 taxi drivers struggling to make ends meet.
http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/lifestyle/Council-foot-cost-resprays/article-2513612-detail/article.html
_________________ Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that. George Carlin
|
|