Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Apr 26, 2026 10:41 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 238 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
AS FOR MRS. CONNOLLY, YOU SEEM TO KNOW HER BUSINESS INSIDE AND OUT. I WOULD HOPE YOU HAVE SPOKEN TO HER AND DISCUSSED
HER BUSINESS DEALINGS IN DETAIL BEFORE MAKING SUCH IN-DEPTH
AND SWEEPING COMMENTS, OR IS THIS JUST ANOTHER OF YOUR
ASSUMPTIONS WHICH YOU THINK IS FACT?
MRS CONNOLLY HAS AN IMPECCABLE REPUTATION WITH THE LIVERPOOL
CAB TRADE, EARNED THROUGH HARD WORK AND DEDICATION OVER THE YEARS.

I have no reason to doubt that.

But then why do you think she mentioned that de-limiting would lead to sex offenders getting licenses?

Did they when Liverpool last de-limited? If they did then one must assume that they must still be in the trade, because no plates have been handed back?

Or perhaps now all those sex offenders are working in the Wirral, since they de-limited. Do you think that's what she meant? Or was it just another round of scare-mongering?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
I HAVE AN EXTREMELY GOOD WORKING RELATIONSHIP WITH PRIVATE
HIRE COMPANY OWNERS AND DRIVERS. AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED
PRIVATE HIRE AND PUBLIC HIRE ARE TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN.
IN SEFTON WE WORK TO PROVIDE A FIRST CLASS HACKNEY AND PRIVATE HIRE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC.

That is the same quote, abeit a different version, that racist often say when people pull them up on their views.

What they say is 'I'm not a racist, I've got coloured friends'. It bo***** when they say it, and it the same when the likes of you repeat your version.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 1:37 pm 
Yorkie wrote:
indeed you couldnt say better yourself indeed you didnt

however later postings from your hero shows backtracking.


My comment was only based on the quote quoted, thats why it was quoted. :wink:

Its worth noting how the earlier part of my post has been ignored though innit.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:01 pm 
yorkie.. am i your hero too. N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. (KEEP THE RED FLAG FLYING) LOVE MR T.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Yorkie wrote:
[
no he means prat,
talking like a proper taximan now.


If you'd said that half an hour ago it might have been of some use, but Mr T got there first, didn't you read his post?

I thought it unlikely that he could mispell prat as prate twice in the same sentence, so thought it could be pirate - ie ommitting one letter, rather than adding one.

But I doubt if you would appreciate that :?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
MR T wrote:
DTO AND SUSSEX. OR BILL AND BEN.

IF YOU THINK I AM BEING ABUSIVE, IT WOULD APPEAR YOU ARE EXTREMELY SENSITIVE ,THIS BEING THE CASE THEN YOU ARE IN THE WRONG TYPE OF WORK......



What was that about the plant pot and poison etc.

You could maybe try the odd smilie :D if you're trying to crack a joke Mr T, and maybe also turn your 'Caps lock' key off - it's considered rude to shout (ie use only CAPITAL LETTERS) on the internet.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
MR T wrote:

YOU KEEP ASKING ME HOW MUCH I PAID FOR MY PLATE,(I HAVE IGNORED YOU) , YOU SIMPLY DO NOT PRY INTO A PERSONS BUSINESS THAT WAY.
BECAUSE OF YOUR OBVIOUS LACK OF BUSINESS ACUMEN I MADE ALLOWANCES FOR YOUR RUDENESS. YOU MAKE ASSUMPTION AFTER
ASSUMPTION AND BELIEVE THAT YOUR ASSUMPTIONS ARE ACTUALLY
FACT. LET US LOOK AT SOME FACTS.



OK Richard Branson (or is it James Dyson?) we can't all have your business acumen :lol:

Why should whether you paid for your plate or not be such a big deal to you? After all, it's a matter of public record, and you are posting using as pseudoym.

I suspect it's just down to senstivity on the issue, perhaps bordering on paranoia.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
MR T wrote:
.

YOU ARE PRIVATE HIRE YET YOU ARGUE OVER A PUBLIC HIRE ISSUE.
THE REAL ISSUE HERE IS THAT YOU WANT TO BE A PUBLIC HIRE DRIVER
[WHY?} .


And you criticise others for making assumptions?

I'm public hire, and in fact I think I've only ever been in one PHV in my whole life, and that wasn't that long ago :D

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
But as for WHY a PH driver would want to be a public hire driver, since you've seem to have been the latter from around the year dot, then if you don't know the answer yet, then I'm speechless :-&

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
MR T wrote:
YOUR ARGUMENT THAT PUBLIC HIRE LICENCES SHOULD HAVE NO RESTRICTIONS ON THEM DOES NOT HOLD WATER. YOU, AS PRIVATE
HIRE HAVE NO RESTRICTIONS PLACED ON YOUR LICENCES, YOU CAN HAVE AS MANY AS YOU WANT, ISSUED TO ANYONE, AND YOU AND I KNOW THAT AT THE BUSIEST TIMES OF THE WEEK PRIVATE HIRE CANNOT COVER THE WORK THAT IT HAS. IN FACT IN SEFTON CUSTOMERS OF OUR PRIVATE HIRE COMPANIES HAVE TO WAIT UP TO
90 MINUTES FOR A CAR. AS I HAVE SAID BEFORE, YOU HAVE NO
RESTRICTIONS, SO WHY IS IT YOU WANT A PUBLIC HIRE LICENCE?
COULD IT BE THAT YOU ARE UNHAPPY WITH BEING A PRIVATE HIRE DRIVER?


Your questions can be answered quite simply - why do YOU prefer being a public hire driver?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
MR T wrote:
AS FOR MRS. CONNOLLY, YOU SEEM TO KNOW HER BUSINESS INSIDE AND OUT. I WOULD HOPE YOU HAVE SPOKEN TO HER AND DISCUSSED
HER BUSINESS DEALINGS IN DETAIL BEFORE MAKING SUCH IN-DEPTH
AND SWEEPING COMMENTS, OR IS THIS JUST ANOTHER OF YOUR
ASSUMPTIONS WHICH YOU THINK IS FACT?
MRS CONNOLLY HAS AN IMPECCABLE REPUTATION WITH THE LIVERPOOL
CAB TRADE, EARNED THROUGH HARD WORK AND DEDICATION OVER THE YEARS.



Well I said 'correct me if I'm wrong' about Mrs Connolly, so presumably I'm right?

Again her plate holdings are a matter of public record, as are her ramblings about the sex offenders.

As for her 'impeccable reputation' with the Liverpool cab trade, so what? She's the most vested of the vested interests there.

Your statement is as relevant as saying that Saddam Hussein had an impeccable reputation with the Ba'ath Party in Iraq.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
MR T wrote:
I HAVE AN EXTREMELY GOOD WORKING RELATIONSHIP WITH PRIVATE
HIRE COMPANY OWNERS AND DRIVERS. AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED
PRIVATE HIRE AND PUBLIC HIRE ARE TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN.
IN SEFTON WE WORK TO PROVIDE A FIRST CLASS HACKNEY AND PRIVATE HIRE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC.



Well I didn't expect you to say anything else.

By the same token I wouldn't expect Tony Blair to say that him and Gordon Brown are like cat and dog.

But presumably there are PH drivers in Sefton who would like the opportunity to have a taxi plate?

If not, then presumably de-restriction shouldn't bother you, should it?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Gateshead Angel wrote:
If Mr T can get a free plate, why can't the drivers whom you claim he will make a profit from, you claim they are excluded, how then isn't Mr T ?





Can GA or anyone else please explain this?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
TDO wrote:
Gateshead Angel wrote:
If Mr T can get a free plate, why can't the drivers whom you claim he will make a profit from, you claim they are excluded, how then isn't Mr T ?


Can GA or anyone else please explain this?

Nope !!! :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Telling half a story cannot possibly be constrewed as letting people know the truth about the trade. If you were to say that many years ago these plates were first issued by the council to people without charge who have subsequently sold the right to operate that plate to the vast majority of current plateholders, for many thousands of pounds. Then you may be getting somewhere close to the real truth.

What you are trying to get people to believe is that every current plateholder got their plate for free and are now trying to sell them for thousands of pounds, and there is little honesty in that.



For crying out loud, a few hours before you posted that, and handful of posts further up the thread, I said:


As for those paying the premium, they do so on the basis that they will be making future excess profits to pay for it, and in the long run will be quids in. Of course, this comes off the backs of the paying public and/or journeyman drivers, so I think you are deluding yourself a bit about hard work.

The point you make has been addressed numerous times on here, and is on the frontpage as well for all to see.

For example, in the Govt U-turn piece we said, in response to a claim like your own:

This seems a rather superficial view, however. For a start, it seems to assume that all licenses in restricted areas have been acquired for a premium, which is obviously not the case. It also seems to say that, for example, someone who bought a plate for £5,000 in an area where plates are currently worth £40,000 has gained nothing, and that the only gains were made by the individual who received the plate for nothing then sold it for the £5,000.

Indeed, Mr Kay seemed to contradict himself in this regard when he said that in New York as the market became more distorted the original medallions holders made capital gains, but why should subsequent purchasers not make such gains, as outlined above, since there is nothing to stop further 'excess profits' accruing subsequent to the original license holder selling it on. Indeed, as we all know, UK plate holders are still making substantial real terms gains irrespective of whether they have received the license gratis, or a substantial time ago for a relatively small sum, or fairly recently for a substantial sum, the hiatus during the OFT uncertainty excepted.


In Myth and Reality:

However, it is often claimed that those who have bought a plate gain no advantage – they buy the right to excess profits at the going rate. But it seems clear that, given that plate values in many locations are gaining in value at rates several times higher than inflation, many plate holders end up earning excess profits even though they have bought the plate – this could be due to many factors, but possibly primarily due to the cartel tightening due to no plates being issued or fewer being issued than the market would demand – this issue is covered in more detail in the next chapter.

But assuming that the gains in value of Liverpool plates accrued evenly throughout the decade, and ignoring inflation, someone who was granted a free plate a decade ago and sold it five years later for £15,000 has gained no more in capital appreciation terms from the closed market than the person who bought the plate for £15,000 five years ago, and has seen it rise in value to £30,000 now.

While these gains have accrued over time, there are of course those who are awarded a ‘free’ plate in a restricted market, and the gains are obviously immediate – for example, a new plate issued in Manchester gains an immediate value of £45,000 or so, and the number of new plates granted are generally small enough not to materially affect the market as a whole – if a relatively large number were granted at once then this would obviously depress the value of each plate.


Last but not least, have a read of the following, which takes issue with the OFT's view that those purchasing plates have just taken a simple risk and deserve no consideration.

http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/money.htm

You seem to have a very selective memory, either that or you just make huge assumptions without ever bothering to read things.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 238 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 833 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group