Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 7:19 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Section 53 states that you can only refuse passengers if you have a 'reasonable excuse'.

Since there doesn't seem to be any specific case law on what 'reasonable excuse' means in this context, unless decided in a court of law in the meantime it must come down to how your LO and/or your licensing committee interpret it.

At a rough guess I would say that it's unreasonable to refuse people who have a pizza in a box (say), but reasonable if they are scoffing an open kebab and clearly would continue to do so while in the taxi.

Perhaps you could ask your LO to clarify in writing the circumstances under which it would be reasonable to refuse a passenger with regard to the consumption of food, and how he comes to this interpretation under s. 53.

If he says it's never reasonable to refuse anyone with regard to food then he's probably being unreasonable!

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
highwayman wrote:
The council quoted me section 53 of the 1847 act, that it is not unreasonable to refuse passengers with food and that I have to stop this practice and take them, any further complaints in the future it will go to court under that section. the section is quite clear and will be used.

I would write to the Chief Executive asking him to put into writing all his LO has said to you. Quoting the acts etc etc.

Or better still get your local press to do a story. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 1409
Location: Grim North, Carrot Crunchers and Codhead Country, North of Watford Gap
TDO wrote:
Section 53 states that you can only refuse passengers if you have a 'reasonable excuse'.

Since there doesn't seem to be any specific case law on what 'reasonable excuse' means in this context, unless decided in a court of law in the meantime it must come down to how your LO and/or your licensing committee interpret it.

At a rough guess I would say that it's unreasonable to refuse people who have a pizza in a box (say), but reasonable if they are scoffing an open kebab and clearly would continue to do so while in the taxi.

Perhaps you could ask your LO to clarify in writing the circumstances under which it would be reasonable to refuse a passenger with regard to the consumption of food, and how he comes to this interpretation under s. 53.

If he says it's never reasonable to refuse anyone with regard to food then he's probably being unreasonable!


The words he told me were. you cannot refuse, Section 53., if the food is wrapped, eg, fish and chips in paper, a kebab box thats closed, if it's not wrapped ie, open to the elements, you can ask them to put it in the boot, carry some carry bags for this purpose, if they still refuse to put it in the boot, you still must now take them, with the food in the cab.

If they start to eat the food you just terminate the journey. he said.

I think someone is trying to make up there own rules here, how about insurance purposes, could this affect my insurance, I know it sounds daft but could it, eg. they slip on the food getting out the cab, who knows,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 1409
Location: Grim North, Carrot Crunchers and Codhead Country, North of Watford Gap
Sussex wrote:
highwayman wrote:
The council quoted me section 53 of the 1847 act, that it is not unreasonable to refuse passengers with food and that I have to stop this practice and take them, any further complaints in the future it will go to court under that section. the section is quite clear and will be used.

I would write to the Chief Executive asking him to put into writing all his LO has said to you. Quoting the acts etc etc.

I'm going to later on, write up a letter, thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
highwayman wrote:
The words he told me were. you cannot refuse, Section 53., if the food is wrapped, eg, fish and chips in paper, a kebab box thats closed, if it's not wrapped ie, open to the elements, you can ask them to put it in the boot, carry some carry bags for this purpose, if they still refuse to put it in the boot, you still must now take them, with the food in the cab.

If they start to eat the food you just terminate the journey. he said.

I think someone is trying to make up there own rules here, how about insurance purposes, could this affect my insurance, I know it sounds daft but could it, eg. they slip on the food getting out the cab, who knows,


If that's the case then I don't really think your LO is being that unreasonable.

I think it depends on the cirmumstances, but a pizza in a box is unlikely to cause damage, whereas a kebab wrapped in paper often has chilli sauce leaking out of it, and that can stain.

Personally I just don't like food at all, because even if they say then won't eat it they quite often do, and halfway through the journey it's often better to say nothing rather than cause a lot of time and hassle for yourself.

But if you reject any and all food then I suspect you are on a sticky wicket.

But it would be interesting to hear what the likes of Worthing would say on the issue if punters can complain about food smells in cabs - vinegar can hang around for hours, for example.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
But if you reject any and all food then I suspect you are on a sticky wicket.


of course if you accept some, you'll have a sticky seat! :wink:

regards

Captain cab

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
But if you reject any and all food then I suspect you are on a sticky wicket.


of course if you accept some, you'll have a sticky seat! :wink:

regards

Captain cab


Talking of sticky? it reminds me of the time I painted the bathroom when the wife was at work, I thought I'd be clever and paint the toilet seat at the same time.

The wife came home sooner than expected, used the toilet and got the seat stuck to her backside. She was understandably distraught and asked me to drive her to the doctor. So we put a large overcoat on to cover the seat before we went. When we got to the doctor's office, I lifted the wife's coat to show him her predicament, I then asked the "Doctor if he'd ever seen anything like this before?"

"Well, yes," the doctor replied, "but never framed."

Now if you beleive that, you'll believe anything? lol

Best wishes

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 1409
Location: Grim North, Carrot Crunchers and Codhead Country, North of Watford Gap
But if you reject any and all food then I suspect you are on a sticky wicket.


well this as certainly got some York cab drivers backs up now, :x the taking of food, those 6 cab drivers who made the complaint have cause quite a stir, :-o since my meeting in front of licensing there is some kinda meeting tomorrow of hacks of the commitee, most of the cabs won't have food anyway near their motors

we must be the only cab area to have internal taxi policemen sat in hack cabs on ranks, what is now starting to happen is cabs are pulling off the rank, with oh gotta radio job or phone job, or sorry gotta pick up my daughter, when the passenger shows up with food, so the cab behind get the stuff, worra laugh, some back stabbers seen to be taking em,but don't like it, but I have also seen them pull off,

It's backfired on them, he he he

Welcome to York Pride and taxis stinking of kebabs.

ps. could some one tell me, when I was in the LO's office he switched on a tape recorder as I arrived [think], he had it in his hand and left it on a desk near us, surely I should have been cautioned about that devise if it was used, your thoughts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 3:16 am 
I cannot comment on an officers right to tape, sorry I dont know, however in guidelines this is the taping proceadure

1 You must be aware you are being taped.
2 You should be read a caution,you dont have to say anything, but it will harm your case iff..................................
3 you should choose a tape from at least 2 twice
4 you should watch as the tape is taken from its cellophane
5 2 tapes should be made and offered to your solicitor if he asks.even if its a later date.
6 you should always be offered the right to have representation
7 you should be asked your name and address and why you are being interviewed on the tape.

I find your ignorance of what happened disturbing, clearly yopu did not know what the hell was happening or your rights, and you should complain to your councillor or MP, CERTAINLY TRADE GROUP OR UNION.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 1409
Location: Grim North, Carrot Crunchers and Codhead Country, North of Watford Gap
I find your ignorance of what happened disturbing, clearly yopu did not know what the hell was happening or your rights, and you should complain to your councillor or MP, CERTAINLY TRADE GROUP OR UNION.


Yorkie, thanks for that, I may have been ignorant at the time of going into the interview, as I really was going into the unknown with other thoughts of what's it all about, it wasn't untill I came out that I thought about the tape device, I have nothing to hide, says me, I am aware that the Tax office use the same, recording device when you are under investigation, they went about it in the same way, not saying anything to me re the recording.

I am in the process of constructing a letter, just waiting a few days to see if an official letter comes first from the LO, I have been advised that I must ask the LO for any tape recording, if I was taped, to be sent a copy.
I have taken advice that the LO has conducted this interview without the proper procedures and that the complaints are not legal to be used in a court of law, to which are to be kept on file, if and when a further taxi violation is commited under section 53.

I also have been informed that when I put my letter to the LO for all the docs to be sent to me I have to ask for the offence original details as sent in by the MEMBER OF THE pUBLIC, apparently it is not accepted from other taxi drivers
I will further this when my letter is answered from the council


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
highwayman wrote:
ps. could some one tell me, when I was in the LO's office he switched on a tape recorder as I arrived [think], he had it in his hand and left it on a desk near us, surely I should have been cautioned about that devise if it was used, your thoughts.

He should have cautioned you. :sad:

But you are entitled to a copy of that tape, so I would write to the council's Freedom of Information Officer requesting a copy.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Isnt there a section of the 1847 act that will permit you compensation should you be found innocent?

and wont the drivers who reported you be liable to pay for you?

hehe

Justice? we wait and see

regards

Captain cab

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Isnt there a section of the 1847 act that will permit you compensation should you be found innocent?

and wont the drivers who reported you be liable to pay for you?

There is a section that says drivers can be prosecuted if claims are deemed to be without foundation.

I think Mr Highwayman should copy the 1847 Act, and give it to those that grass.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
But the essential point at issue is when it's unreasonable to refuse a passenger, particularly in relation to the carrying of food.

But clearly there seems to be more to this than the fundamental question at the centre of it all.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:17 pm 
Just eat it yourself.
End of problem.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 202 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group