Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 6:15 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:10 pm
Posts: 31
Ears1096 wrote:
If the York Council get an application from Amber/Arrow then all vehicles will have to be licensed by them plus all the drivers will have to undergo an application process (knowledge tests, CRB's etc) unless they are going to try and poach local licensed drivers. That could all take time.


What if they all get licensed in another area as Hackneys? and then just come to York and accept pre booked work?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
The Jester wrote:
What if they all get licensed in another area as Hackneys? and then just come to York and accept pre booked work?


Perfectly legal if the council issuing the license doesnt ask where the vehicle will be worked.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 1409
Location: Grim North, Carrot Crunchers and Codhead Country, North of Watford Gap
rhinogolf wrote:
James1 I'm an independent hackney working in York station. Regrettably the owner of the car will not let me have a station radio put in.Like most independents in the station there all ante station taxis.
Are you saying Amber are going to try and expand there business into York.
How many drivers do they have at the moment and what are your radio charges.


I have heard that Amber Cars will supply 50 brand new vehicles for the York Stn contract, otherwise, 659 taxis [private hire] of York are trying to secure a deal for an operating base in one of the letting property at York Stn, rents rather high, if 659 are still proceding i do not have a clue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 1409
Location: Grim North, Carrot Crunchers and Codhead Country, North of Watford Gap
Ears1096 wrote:
If the York Council get an application from Amber/Arrow then all vehicles will have to be licensed by them plus all the drivers will have to undergo an application process (knowledge tests, CRB's etc) unless they are going to try and poach local licensed drivers. That could all take time.


that wont be a problem will it, drivers will just move


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 1409
Location: Grim North, Carrot Crunchers and Codhead Country, North of Watford Gap
rhinogolf wrote:
As normal stinky your moaning away and cant keep up with the times.
How many times have you slagged station taxis of when they own the tender for the station and charge you £18.26 a week to work the station on your 18hr shifts 24/7.
If and when Amber take over you will realize what a good deal you and every1 else had at the station.(And dont forget they took over Leeds/Bradford)
I dont no if you realize at Newcastle station they pay £1900 a driver (not per car)and £10 a week admin get with the times.

If Amber get the tender you will be paying over 3k a year (i can hear you now i wont pay that) but you will and nearly every1 else will pay it.

but why, why do you pay, when it got to 365 pounds a year i gave up, York Stn taxi do not own the tender, when a few years ago a strike was callled, we all pilled out of the Stn, the Railway management started pleading with the drivers to come back in, they only did so after the chairman of Stn Taxis at the time was Mr Young, he has over the years been banned from the Stn taxi rank

you have only your selves to blame, us and them thats how its worked for years, those that have permits and those that dont, the only way forward now but a bit late is to stick together


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 1409
Location: Grim North, Carrot Crunchers and Codhead Country, North of Watford Gap
Ears1096 wrote:
If the York Council get an application from Amber/Arrow then all vehicles will have to be licensed by them plus all the drivers will have to undergo an application process (knowledge tests, CRB's etc) unless they are going to try and poach local licensed drivers. That could all take time.


i really think that these people know what they are doing, pity the Council got rid of the Council rank outside the Stn or even failed in planning the one in Tea Room Sq when they altered the road network outside the Stn


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:20 pm
Posts: 13
Location: York
Like i said Pete move with the times.Its just how it works now and yes station taxis do own the tender.
As for them and us thats what you your selfs have made it like i said earlier im an independent and i get on with all drivers but unfortunately people like you (prehistoric) wont move with the times.Why should i pay to pick up from the station GROW UP FELLA £2.60 a day there giving it away.
Ive been made redundant 3 times( railway armstrongs and terrys) all closed down because of people with the same attitude as you thinking these firms owe you when they were paying us good money.
As far as i can make out station taxis dont make money out of the station rank ie charging independent single drivers a charge of £18.26 a week.
How much do you think amber will charge or 659 or joe bloggs???
If you want a permit apply for1 the only way you will get refused is if you wont wear the uniform and badge.
I would love to no what other drivers pay at other stations i would but money not many are cheaper than York with the turnover of passengers.So come on lads n lasses let us no


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Quote:
If you want a permit apply for1 the only way you will get refused is if you wont wear the uniform and badge.


So your not independent really are you, if your forced to wear there noddy suits


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:20 pm
Posts: 13
Location: York
Like i said mate get with the times is it a hardship to wear a white shirt and black top id say no.And id also but my house your over 50 with your outlook on the taxi trade and all the negative posts you reply to.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
skippy41 wrote:
Quote:
If you want a permit apply for1 the only way you will get refused is if you wont wear the uniform and badge.


So your not independent really are you, if your forced to wear there noddy suits


It's part of the contract skippy.

I'm sure if station taxis protest about drivers having to wear uniforms a private hire company will not have the same issue......is that what you want?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
captain cab wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
Quote:
If you want a permit apply for1 the only way you will get refused is if you wont wear the uniform and badge.


So your not independent really are you, if your forced to wear there noddy suits


It's part of the contract skippy.

I'm sure if station taxis protest about drivers having to wear uniforms a private hire company will not have the same issue.....
Quote:
.is that what you want?

CC


No I would like you and the rest of the union reps to get rid of permit charges nationwide.
This should have been sorted years ago but as usual all the unions dont give a feck
You should be helping drivers out of these charges regardless of if they are members


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
skippy41 wrote:
No I would like you and the rest of the union reps to get rid of permit charges nationwide.
This should have been sorted years ago but as usual all the unions dont give a feck
You should be helping drivers out of these charges regardless of if they are members


I am NOT a union rep :shock:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
captain cab wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
No I would like you and the rest of the union reps to get rid of permit charges nationwide.
This should have been sorted years ago but as usual all the unions dont give a feck
You should be helping drivers out of these charges regardless of if they are members


I am NOT a union rep :shock:

CC


But you go to the union meetings or annual knees up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
skippy41 wrote:
But you go to the union meetings or annual knees up


It's not a union. :shock:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
No I would like you and the rest of the union reps to get rid of permit charges nationwide.
This should have been sorted years ago but as usual all the unions dont give a feck
You should be helping drivers out of these charges regardless of if they are members


So what you're suggesting Skippy is that people should interfere whether the drivers asked for help or not? If they are not members you cannot assume they want your help. Apart from that what would be the point of becoming a member if non members get the same treatment :?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 227 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group