Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed May 06, 2026 4:58 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Telford Private Hire Drivers’ Association chairman suspended

Friday 4th February 2011, 7:41PM GMT

The chairman of the Telford Private Hire Drivers’ Association has been suspended, it was revealed today. Mohammed Zaman and a second private hire driver was suspended by Tel-ford & Wrekin Council licensing chiefs.

It comes after Mr Zaman said he was called by colleagues to the council’s MoT depot in Donnington on January 20 during a spot-check operation.

He alleged that the council licensing officers were only stopping Asian drivers during weekly spot checks.

He said voices were raised between himself and a licensing officer.

Mr Zaman said he had done nothing wrong and was now calling for an investigation into allegations of racial discrimination against private hire firms, which was previously the subject of an inquiry in Telford.

He added: “We are asking for the Race Equality people to reopen the inquiry from 2006. I am fighting this all the way. I ran the association with a clean heart. I’m going to clear my name.”

The drivers have been suspended for allegedly bre-aching licence conditions.

Russell Griffin, council spokesman, said: “The suspensions will remain in place until they are considered by the council’s licensing committee on March 8.

“The drivers concerned have the right to appeal against the decision to the magistrates court within 21 days.”

Source; http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2011 ... z1D4jn9Zjr

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
He alleged that the council licensing officers were only stopping Asian drivers during weekly spot checks.


Conveniently forgetting that there are no non-Asian drivers. :lol:

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 431
Do not want to turn this into a racist rant, But, it would be hard to stop a white driver in Manchester now, if you did you would be discriminating against a minority group.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
He alleged that the council licensing officers were only stopping Asian drivers during weekly spot checks.


Perhaps a foi letter would sort out exactly what the % are of ethnic drivers here, in fact anywhere in the country for that matter. Obviously if there is a high concentration of ethnic drivers in an area it may well appear that they are being targetted when perhaps they are not

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57364
Location: 1066 Country
Do they have powers to suspend?

Other than having a rare up with the LOs what has changed their 'fit and proper' status?

Have customers been attacked, or overcharged, or been rude to?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
This I suppose is an abuse of section 52 - or does anyone know better?

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Chris the Fish wrote:
This I suppose is an abuse of section 52 - or does anyone know better?


I guess it depends on what basis they have been suspended :? Also I thought they didn't have the right to appeal under section 52?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
toots wrote:
I guess it depends on what basis they have been suspended :? Also I thought they didn't have the right to appeal under section 52?


If you are suspended by use of section 52 you can appeal. But you remain suspended until the appeal is heard.

That means if, as in Ashfeld, you get a month of suspension, you won't have your appeal heard until after you are back working.

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
I'm sure we'll find out in due course........it seems to me if he is completely innocent he does protest too much ?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 11:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
captain cab wrote:
I'm sure we'll find out in due course........it seems to me if he is completely innocent he does protest too much ?

CC

If his crime is "verbal" at the LO, then Section 52 is way OTT.

You know what Section 52 is supposed to be for.

You don't like its existence, that’s OK that is your position.

I want it available, but only for what it was intended for.

It was not for this.

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 11:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Chris the Fish wrote:
captain cab wrote:
I'm sure we'll find out in due course........it seems to me if he is completely innocent he does protest too much ?

CC

If his crime is "verbal" at the LO, then Section 52 is way OTT.

You know what Section 52 is supposed to be for.

You don't like its existence, that’s OK that is your position.

I want it available, but only for what it was intended for.

It was not for this.


I agree......'if'........but what 'if' the licensing officer was assaulted?

As I say, we should be able to obtain a report to the committee and read the other side of the argument.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 11:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
On that CC, "d,acord".

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 11:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Chris the Fish wrote:
On that CC, "d,acord".


PMSL.....you're a bilingual illiterate like me :lol:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 11:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
Si Senor.

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 06, 2011 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57364
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
I agree......'if'........but what 'if' the licensing officer was assaulted?

Then the driver should have been charged by the police, and a section 52 issue would arise.

If the police aren't involved I'm not sure any section 52 issue can arise.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 762 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group